Friday, February 27, 2026

Alcibiades: A Life

Alcibiades was born in the ancient Greek city of Athens around 450 BC. Athens was just one of nearly a thousand Greek city-states. We call them city-states because each city had its own government. It was rare for cities to be linked together under the same government. This can be hard for us to imagine, because it's not what we're used to. Take Ohio for example: you have Cincinnati, Dayton, Columbus, Cleveland, and Toledo - all are major cities, but they all operate under the Ohio government. If we were fashioned like ancient Greece, then Cincinnati would be its own city-state with its own government, Dayton would be its own city-state with its own government, and maybe we like the people in Dayton and maybe we don't! Some years maybe we'll be nice with them, and trade with them, but other years we might go to war with them. That's what it was like in ancient Greece during the time of Alcibiades.

The city-state of Athens had just entered into what has been called the 'Athenian Golden Age,' a period of about half a century in which the economy grew, arts and culture flourished, philosophy reached new heights, and in which Athenian democracy was strengthened. Athens hadn't always been so high-and-mighty; just thirty years before Alcibiades' birth, Athens was almost overrun and razed by the Persians! Thankfully the Greeks were able to kick out the Persians, and in their victory, several Greek cities entered into an alliance called the Delian League (the alliance was officially established on the sacred island of Delos, from which we get Delian). Athens was the head of this league, and the purpose of the league was to form a defensive alliance against Persia. If Persia wanted a bite out of Athens - and she did! - then she would need to deal with all of Athens' friends, too. Athens, as head of the league, provided most of the ships and material needed to patrol the Aegean Sea and to use in case of an attack; the other member states - they eventually reached over 100 members! - provided cash to the league's treasury. Athens, as head of the league, had control over the treasury, and lots of that money went to elevating Athens.

One of the main architects of this so-called Golden Age was a statesman named Pericles. He was able to draw from the Delian League's treasury, and he did so with abandon, guiding the city through unprecedented cultural, intellectual, and artistic flourishing. It was he who commissioned the building of famous Greek temples, including the Parthenon, a temple dedicated to the Greek goddess Athena. Pericles led the way to Athens becoming the educational and cultural center of the Greek world; he fostered philosophy (you've certainly heard of Socrates and Aristotle!) and drama (plays by Sophocles and Euripides are still cherished today). He strengthened Athenian democracy by introducing pay for public service (like jury duty) and reducing the power of aristocratic lawmakers who had a tendency to lord it over the poorer citizens. Under Pericles' leadership - with significant assistance from the Delian League's treasury - Athens moved from just another city-state to the head of an Athenian Empire that dominated the Aegean. It was Pericles who orchestrated much of this - or at least created the environment in which a Golden Age could thrive - so he was called 'the first citizen of Athens' by the later Greek historian Thucydides. When we picture classical Greece, it's likely the picture we envision is that of Athens in its Golden Age).

Athens during its Golden Age

But where does Alcibiades fit into this? Alcibiades was born into a prestigious, noble family, but he was orphaned as a boy. He then moved in with a relative of his, none other than the Pericles we've just leaned about. Pericles was pretty busy running around the city to provide much fatherly guidance, leaving Alcibiades largely unsupervised. It's no surprise, then, that he developed a reputation for extravagance, self-centeredness, and wild behavior. It takes the loving discipline of a parent to smooth out our hard edges and to train us how to be an asset rather than a liability to society; Alcibiades didn't have this, and his character flaws would plague his life as an adult.

As a young man, Alcibiades befriended the philosopher Socrates, who noted that this wild ruffian was also quite intelligent and quick-witted. The two of them became fast companions, even fighting in battle together. When Alcibiades was just twenty years old, war erupted in Greece again: this time Greece wasn't fighting against the Persians but against each other! The Delian League had grown powerful, and many Greek city-states who didn't join the league wanted to curb that power. Another league was formed, called the Peloponnesian League, and this one was led by the Greek city-state of Sparta. The two leagues went to war with each other, and they fought for 27 years! This isn't the place to dig deep into the Peloponnesian War, but suffice it to say, it was a war marked less by classic land engagements and more by raids, counter-raids, sieges and counter-sieges, skirmishes, and naval encounters. Due to the guerrilla nature of the campaigns, there are few set-piece battles; indeed, the Peloponnesian War has been referred to as 'the Vietnam of the Greek Age' for this very reason. The Peloponnesian War eventually ended with the fall of Athens: her city walls torn down, her empire dissolved, and her democracy replaced with an oligarchy in which the rich call all the shots. But even though Sparta won, she was just as winded; in fact, all of Greece was exhausted and burnt out. Only decades later, the Greek city-states, still recovering from the internal war, fell easy prey to a hybrid outsider named Philip II of Macedon. His son, Alexander, is a story for another day.

But back to Alcibiades. He and the philosopher Socrates became good friends, despite Socrates being twice Alcibiades' age. Just a year before the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War, Alcibiades received his first taste of combat outside the Greek city of Potidaea. Potidaea sat on the Chalcidice peninsula in northern Greece; it was originally founded as a Corinthian colony, but it had become part of the Delian League. Potidaea paid tribute to Athens, but it still received annual magistrates from Corinth; this created an awkward situation, as the Corinthians were allies of Sparta. As tensions between Athens and Sparta ratcheted up, Athens became increasingly worried about Potidaea's mixed loyalties. Athens issued a decree that Potidaea demolish parts of its defensive outer walls, hand over hostages, and expel the Corinthian magistrates. The Potidaeans balked at this demand and, with support from Corinth and some nearby towns, severed their ties to the Delian League. At the same time, Corinth dispatched volunteer soldiers and a military commander to garrison the city. Athens responded by sending a fleet and troops to suppress the revolt.

Onboard those ships were Alcibiades and Socrates. In the summer of 432 BC, about 3000 hoplites disembarked onto the Chalcidian peninsula to face off against a combined enemy force of Potidaeans, Corinthian volunteers, and local allies. The two sides drew up for battle outside the city walls and threw themselves at each other. The rival phalanxes clashed; while the Corinthian left wing was initially successful at pushing back the Athenians, the Athenians compensated by winning the field elsewhere. During the battle, Socrates reputedly heroically rescued a wounded Alcibiades, carrying him to safety behind the front lines. The Potidaeans broke and sought refuge behind the city walls. By the end of the clash, the Athenians lost 150 men (including their general) while the Potidaeans and their ilk lost twice that.

With the rebels ensconced behind the city walls, Athens blockaded the city by both land and sea. The siege would last about two and a half years; in the process it drained money and manpower from the Delian League, and at one point Athenian relief forces brought the plague to the besieging troops. The city capitulated in 429 BC. Athens executed all men of military age, enslaved the city's women and children, and later resettled the city with Athenian colonists. Corinth was outraged by the affair, and they used this travesty to further woo Sparta towards war with Athens. Indeed, complaints about the siege of Potidaea and Athenian aggression come up repeatedly in Spartan debates of the time, and these issues directly contributed to their declaration of war in 431 BC.

Alcibiades, no doubt thankful that Socrates saved his life, returned the favor eight years later at the 424 BC Battle of Delium. At this time, the Peloponnesian League was allied with the Boeotian League. The Boeotian League was led by the city-state of Thebes. The Athenian generals Demosthenes and Hippocrates (the latter was the nephew of Pericles and thus distantly related to Alcibiades) came up with a plan: weaken Thebes by seizing territory in Boeotia and fomenting democratic revolts across Theban-controlled lands. To accomplish this, Demosthenes would attack Boeotia's southern coast by sea; Hippocrates would take and fortify Delium, a temple site on the coast near the Attic border. Delium would become a springboard from which Boeotian rebels could be supported.

The Spartans learned of the Athenian strategy and alerted the Boeotians. The coastal town of Siphae, Demosthenes' target, was reinforced, and Demosthenes was repulsed. Hippocrates was thus left alone, and he started out with some success in capturing Delium. He was just beginning to reinforce its fortifications when a Boeotian army led by General Pagondas of Thebes approached the temple town in November or December of 424. Both sides matched each others' numbers, bringing about 18,000 men each to the field. The Athenian army consisted of seven thousand hoplites, ten thousand light troops, and a thousand cavalry; the Boeotian army consisted of the same, except they had an additional five hundred peltasts. The armies clashed outside Delium. The Athenian wing initially pushed back the Boeotian left, but Pagondas had a trick up his sleeve: he held back a cavalry reserve and committed it at a decisive moment against the Athenian left. The shock cavalry charge - one of the earliest recorded deliberate uses of cavalry reserve in battle - panicked the Athenians; the army collapsed and was routed. During the retreat, Socrates kept his cool, steadying others and refusing to break formation. Alcibiades, on horseback, allegedly protected him multiple times during their retreat. Some soldiers fled into Attica; others towards the sea; and others sought refuge in Delium. The Athenians lost over a thousand slain, including Hippocrates, while the Boeotians lost just half that. The Athenians who had sought safety in Delium found themselves surrounded by a besieging army determined to wrest back their temple town. Delium fell to the besiegers seventeen days after the Battle of Delium (the Boeotians reportedly used a flame-thrower to burn the wooden fortification).

Socrates hoped that Alcibiades would develop into a virtuous politician - if there is such a thing! - but Alcibiades spurned this route for one that was more appealing: become the kind of golden-tongued, two-faced politician that Athenians loved. For the Greeks, the ultimate goal for any person was called eudaimonia, which means 'a fully-flourishing life.' It was Aristotle, a student of Plato (who was himself a student of Socrates), who put meat to this idea. The idea behind eudaimonia is that we are all searching for the best kind of life, and this life is found in living virtuously and fulfilling one's sacred duties to the gods, to one's family, and to one's city. It isn't to be found in the pursuit of pleasure but in a purposeful, duty-bound, virtuous life. This was the guiding light behind Socrates' Socratic method: he saw it as the best way to shape a whole person (body, mind, character, morals, and soul). The goal was to produce a well-rounded, virtuous individual who could participate fully in the city-state, think critically, appreciate beauty, stay physically fit, and live a good, ethical life.

Alcibiades entered the Athenian political scene in his late 20s, and he made a name for himself: he was a gifted orator and showman. Alcibiades was gifted, but he had a disability: he had a speech impediment called rhotacism, in which he pronounced his 'R' sounds as 'W' sounds. In other words, he sounded like Elmer Fudd: 'Come here you wascally wabbit!' His political enemies often called attention to it, and ancient playwrights mentioned it a lot. Alcibiades didn't seem bothered by his 'lisping charm' (as the historian Thucydides put it); in fact, it looks like he wore it as a badge of honor and made no effort to hide it! He had his goals in life, and he wouldn't let something as silly as a disability get in his way. He entered seven chariots at the 416 BC Olympic Games, winning three different medals. Around 420 BC, at the age of thirty, he was made an Athenian general; he pushed for enhanced aggression against Sparta on the island of Sicily. He wanted to conquer Syracuse, the premier city in Sicily, and expand Athenian power. He was appointed co-commander of the expedition, and he was scheduled to sail with the fleet. Just before they departed, scandal erupted: all across Athens, sacred statues of the Greek god Hermes had been mutilated, and Alcibiades was accused of sacrilege. Alcibiades knew that if he was summoned to Athens to stand trial, the democratic processes would condemn him and he'd be killed. While Socrates was the sort who would gladly kill himself for the benefit of the state, Alcibiades didn't have such virtue: he turned on the Athenians and escaped to his enemy, Sparta.

In Sparta, Alcibiades switched sides, becoming a military strategist for the Peloponnesian League. He seduced the wife of the Spartan king and fathered a child with her. This wore out his welcome, so he fled again, this time to the court of the Persian governor in Asia Minor. He lavished in Persian luxuries while advising the Persians on how best to settle the score with their Greek rivals. While he was doing this, the Athenians were doing awful in Sicily - Sparta learned from Alcibiades how to target Athenian weaknesses - and dealing with government coups. Alcibiades saw an opening to return to Athens. He knew he needed to get in good with the citizens there, and to this end he aided Athenian forces loyal to democracy, winning several important battles. The Athenians begged him to return, and in 407 BC, at the age of 43, Alcibiades returned to Athens as a hero and was given supreme command of the war effort against the Peloponnesian League. He seemed unstoppable, but when the Athenians were defeated at the naval battle of Notium, he was blamed for it (even though he wasn't present), and he had to flee again, this time to a castle in Thrace far to the north. Shortly after this, the Spartans destroyed the Athenian fleet at Aegospotami, sealing Athens' fate. Alcibiades, hearing the news, returned to Persian territory in Asia Minor to escape any angry Athenian assassins hungry for his blood. Just a year into his Persian stay, the Persians decided they didn't want him, either: Persian assassins set fire to his home. Alcibiades ran out of his home wielding swords and ready to fight, and fight he did, though he died in the process at the age of 46.

Alcibiades was beloved by ancient historians and philosophers. They found in Alcibiades a chilling theme: you can have immense talent, but that talent can be undone by your own flaws.


Tuesday, February 24, 2026

The Macedonian Wars: 214 - 168 BC



The air still carried the metallic tang of bronze and the sweet smoke of funeral pyres when Alexander the Great died in Babylon in 323 BC. In barely over a decade he had turned Macedonia into the beating heart of the world’s largest empire, its hoofbeats echoing from the olive groves of Greece to the sun-scorched cliffs of Persia and the lotus-choked banks of the Nile. When the king’s fevered breath finally stopped, no heir stood ready. The empire shattered like glass under a hammer.

For nearly half a century the Successor Wars raged—screaming cavalry charges, the wet crunch of sarissas through flesh, cities burning with the acrid stink of pitch and charred cedar. From that furnace of ambition emerged three great kingdoms, each rising like a blood-streaked phoenix:
The Seleucids, ruling the shimmering heat-haze of the eastern plains

The Ptolemies, enthroned amid the green perfume of the Nile and the salt breeze off Alexandria’s harbor

The Antigonids, who kept Macedonia’s pine-scented mountains and the stony hills of Greece

A fourth realm, the Attalid kingdom of Pergamum, would soon rise on the western edge of Anatolia, its acropolis gleaming white against dark cypresses.

The Antigonid kings inherited a land of constant war-drums. From the north came the Gauls—wild, lime-crusted hair streaming, iron swords clanging against bronze shields, their war-cries rolling down the valleys like thunder. In the south the Greek cities erupted again and again, the narrow streets of Athens and Corinth ringing with the slap of sandals, the crack of whips, and the bitter shouts of “Freedom!” Only in 276 BC did Antigonus Gonatas finally hammer the kingdom into shape, his iron grip smelling of sweat, horseflesh, and lamp-black ink.

Macedonia dominated the north. Southward, the old city-states clung to their liberty like men clutching the last spar of a wrecked ship. Afraid of the shadow cast by Macedonian pikes, they forged leagues: the Aetolian League in the craggy west, where goats bleated among limestone cliffs, and the Achaean League across the Peloponnese, where the dry wind rattled through olive branches. These alliances gave the poleis new strength—yet the Achaeans and Spartans still bled each other in petty, vicious border wars, their bronze greaves ringing and their spear-butts thudding into shields while Macedonia watched, amused.

Then Rome’s long shadow stretched across the water.


The First Macedonian War (214–205 BC)
By 214 BC Rome had tasted Cannae—fifty thousand corpses bloating under the Italian sun, the air thick with flies and the reek of blood. Philip V of Macedon, young, restless, and hungry, smelled weakness. He declared war on Rome, dreaming of Illyrian harbors and Greek ports falling under his banners.

The First Macedonian War was a grinding, ugly affair. Philip’s soldiers raided coastal villages, the crackle of burning thatch mixing with women’s screams and the bleating panic of goats. Roman triremes clashed with Macedonian galleys in narrow channels; oar-blades splintered, men gargled seawater and blood. The Aetolians allied with Rome, the Achaeans with Philip. No great pitched battle ever came—just ambushes in mountain passes, the screech of swords on shields, the stink of unwashed bodies and horse dung in summer heat. Both sides grew weary. In 205 BC the Peace of Phoenice was signed.


The Second Macedonian War (200–197 BC)
In 204 BC Ptolemy IV died, leaving a child-king and a rotting court in Alexandria. Philip V and Antiochus III the Great whispered together in secret, their words heavy with the scent of wine and intrigue. They agreed to divide the helpless Ptolemaic lands. Philip turned north and east, toward Thrace and the windy narrows of the Dardanelles. His soldiers sacked coastal towns; the air grew bitter with smoke and the coppery smell of fresh slaughter. Pergamum’s countryside was ravaged—wheat fields trampled into mud, orchards hacked down, the sweet rot of crushed figs rising in the heat.

Rhodes and Pergamum begged Rome for aid. Fresh from victory over Hannibal, Rome had no patience for half-finished wars. Ambassadors sailed east, their cloaks stiff with salt. They warned Philip to leave Athens, Rhodes, Pergamum, and the Aetolians untouched. Philip answered with fire. He ravaged Attica; the olive groves around Athens filled with the crackle of burning trees and the wail of refugees. He laid siege to Abydus. When the walls could hold no longer, Philip gave the defenders three days. The city stank of fear—sweat, urine, fear-loosened bowels. Parents slit their children’s throats with trembling hands; the wet gurgle of blood on stone mingled with mothers’ choked sobs. Gold and silver clinked as they were hurled into the black water below the cliffs. The men swore to die free. When the Macedonians finally stormed the breach, they found only silence, cooling bodies, and the dull glint of abandoned weapons.

War with Rome could no longer be avoided. The Second Macedonian War crawled along for two years—muddy camps, the sour odor of wet wool, the constant rasp of whetstones on iron. Then Titus Quinctius Flamininus arrived in 198 BC. He chased Philip from Greece like a wolf harrying deer. At the mountainous Battle of the Aous, the mountain pass rang with the crash of shields and the screams of the dying.

Picture this: a deep, narrow river gorge slices through the mountains of what is now southern Albania, near the modern course of the Aoös/Aous River between Tepelenë and Këlcyrë. Sheer rock walls rise hundreds of feet on both sides, funneling the fast-flowing, turquoise-green river into a constricted torrent that roars over boulders and rapids. The valley floor is barely wide enough in places for a few hundred men to stand shoulder-to-shoulder. Above, steep, scrub-covered slopes and jagged cliffs tower overhead, dotted with sparse pine and oak. King Philip V of Macedon had chosen this natural fortress deliberately. His roughly 20,000-strong army — disciplined Macedonian phalangites in their distinctive bronze helmets and red cloaks, lighter peltasts, Thracian and Illyrian auxiliaries with curved shields and javelins — held the narrow pass like a cork in a bottle. They built field fortifications of earth and stone across the gorge floor and perched on the high ground, sarissas (long pikes) bristling outward. Any Roman attempt to force the position head-on would be suicide: men would be funneled into a killing zone of javelins, arrows, and rolling boulders, then skewered by the long pikes of the phalanx.

For over forty days the two armies stared at each other across the river. Roman consul Flamininus, commanding two legions plus allies (roughly 20,000–25,000 men), probed and skirmished but could make no progress. The river itself ran blood-red in places from minor clashes. Dust clouds rose whenever Roman velites (skirmishers) darted forward to exchange missile fire with Macedonian light troops on the heights. Then came the turning point — one of the classic “local guide” moments of ancient history. A Greek or Epirote shepherd (or possibly several local herders) approached the Romans and offered critical intelligence: there existed a hidden, precipitous goat-track snaking high up one of the mountain flanks, invisible from the valley floor. It was treacherous — loose scree, narrow ledges, places where men had to crawl or pass weapons hand-to-hand — but it led to the high ground behind Philip’s position.

Flamininus seized the chance. Under cover of darkness and morning mist, he detached a strong force (several thousand legionaries and allies, led by tribunes) to climb this secret path. The climb was agonizing: soldiers hauled themselves up by roots and rocks, shields clanging against stone, trying not to send cascades of pebbles tumbling down and betray their movement. Dawn light began to spill over the ridges as the flanking column finally reached the crest. Below them, the Macedonian camp and battle line were spread out in the narrow valley — completely unaware. At the pre-arranged signal, Flamininus launched the frontal assault once more. Roman pila (javelins) arced through the air in dark clouds, thudding into Macedonian shields with heavy thunks. Legionaries in segmented armor and red tunics surged forward shouting, shields locked. The Macedonians braced, confident in their terrain.

Then — chaos from above. The Roman flanking force erupted onto the heights behind the Macedonian line. Legionaries charged downhill, screaming war cries, swords flashing. Macedonians on the rear ranks turned in horror to see helmeted figures pouring over the ridge like an avalanche of iron and bronze. Panic spread like wildfire through Philip’s army. The once-impenetrable phalanx formation fractured as men tried to face both directions at once. Long sarissas — deadly when facing forward — became useless liabilities in a swirling melee. The gorge became a slaughter pen. Macedonians were driven toward the river cliffs or crushed against their own fortifications. Many leapt or fell into the rushing Aous, armor dragging them under. Others were cut down as they tried to flee up the steep slopes. Roman swords and pila did terrible work at close quarters; blood soaked the dust and ran in rivulets down the rocks into the river.

Philip V himself barely escaped with his bodyguard, abandoning his camp and much of his baggage. Around 2,000 Macedonians lay dead in the gorge and on the slopes — a heavy but not annihilating loss. The terrain that had once protected them now prevented any serious Roman pursuit; the broken army slipped away toward Thessaly. The scene afterward would have been grim and cinematic: a silent, narrow valley choked with bodies in bronze and iron, broken sarissas jutting from the ground like felled trees, Roman soldiers picking through the Macedonian camp under a hot Balkan sun, the river below still carrying red threads downstream.

The Battle of the Aous was not a massive set-piece field battle like Cynoscephalae or Pydna that followed. It was instead a masterpiece of terrain, deception, and sudden vertical envelopment — a vivid demonstration that even the famous Macedonian phalanx could be undone when its unbeatable frontal wall was turned into a death trap from behind. The battle didn’t bring an end to the war, but it left both armies hunting each other across the rolling plains and ridges of eastern Thessaly, and in the summer next year, 197 BC, they were nipping at each other near the town of Scotussa.

Philip needed grain badly—his men were hungry, their bellies rumbling after weeks of short rations. He marched west along the northern slopes of a low, broken range of hills called Cynoscephalae (“Dog’s Heads”), searching for supplies and level ground where his phalanx could deploy in its full, terrifying glory. Flamininus shadowed him on the southern slopes, the two armies parallel but out of sight, separated by the jagged spine of the hills. The air smelled of dry grass, wild thyme, and the faint salt of the distant sea.

The night before the battle a fierce thunderstorm rolled over Thessaly—lightning cracking across the black sky, rain hammering tents and turning paths to slick mud. Dawn broke gray and heavy with fog so thick it muffled sound and hid the world beyond a few dozen paces. The hills loomed like the humped backs of sleeping beasts, their slopes uneven, rocky, and cut by gullies and scrub.Around first light, both commanders sent scouting parties forward to seize the high ground and find the enemy. Philip dispatched about 800 light infantry and 50 cavalry; Flamininus sent roughly 1,000 velites (skirmishers) and 300 horsemen. In the swirling mist, the two groups blundered into each other on the crest of one of the ridges. For a heartbeat there was stunned silence—only the drip of water from helmets and the snort of horses—then javelins hissed through the fog, bronze clanged on shields, men shouted in Greek and Latin, and blood began to flow.

The skirmish swelled quickly. Messengers galloped back through the murk, horns blared, and both armies began to pour men toward the sound of fighting. Philip, hearing reports of Roman weakness, reluctantly committed more troops despite the unsuitable ground. He ordered half his phalanx—some 8,000–10,000 sarissa-armed heavy infantry—up the slope, along with 4,000 peltasts and light troops. The long pikes rose like a forest of steel; boots thudded on wet earth; the rhythmic tramp echoed off the hills. Flamininus, equally blind in the fog, formed his whole army—about 26,000 men, including two full Roman legions, Italian allies, 6,000 Aetolian infantry, Cretan archers, and 20 war elephants—and advanced to support his skirmishers.

The fog began to lift unevenly, revealing patches of the battlefield. The Macedonian right wing, under Philip himself, crested the ridge first and slammed into the Roman left. The phalanx, though compressed and disordered by the climb and the broken ground, drove forward with terrible force. Eighteen-foot sarissas thrust out in layers; Roman shields splintered, men were impaled or thrown backward with screams. The Roman left buckled and began to give way, blood soaking the grass, the coppery reek mixing with crushed thyme and wet soil. On the opposite flank, however, the Macedonian left was slower—still struggling up the steeper, rockier slope, its formation ragged and incomplete. Flamininus saw the opportunity. He held his victorious right wing in check, then—according to Polybius—ordered an unnamed military tribune to take twenty maniples (about 2,400 men) from the rear lines of his successful right, wheel them across the face of the hill, and strike the exposed Macedonian left in flank and rear.

The tribune’s men moved fast—shields locked, short pila gripped tightly, the low growl of centurions urging them on. They poured down into the gap between the Macedonian wings like wolves through a broken fence. The phalanx on the Macedonian left, caught half-deployed, could not turn quickly enough. The long sarissas, deadly in frontal combat on flat ground, became useless liabilities—too long to swing sideways, too awkward on uneven terrain. Roman pila arced in darkening clouds, thudding into faces and necks; then the maniples closed, gladii flashing in short, vicious stabs under the pike line—into groins, armpits, bellies. Men shrieked as iron tore through linen and flesh; blood sprayed hot across bronze greaves; the once-solid formation disintegrated into a chaos of individual struggles. Philip’s right wing, still pushing the Roman left, suddenly felt the pressure ease as news of the disaster spread. Panic rippled through the ranks. The phalanx began to waver, then break. Men dropped their sarissas and ran—shields clattering, greaves ringing, the slope turning into a slaughter as Romans pursued. Philip himself, realizing the day was lost, gathered his cavalry and royal guard and fled the field, dust and screams trailing behind him.

The killing went on until evening. The broken hills were strewn with Macedonian dead—some 8,000 killed, another 5,000 captured, many wounded and crawling. Roman losses were far lighter—around 700 dead, though the number of wounded was higher. The ground reeked of blood, ruptured bowels, spilled wine from broken canteens, and the acrid smoke of trampled campfires. Shattered sarissas lay like broken reeds; bronze shields glinted dully in the fading light. Philip escaped with perhaps a third of his army intact, but the defeat was catastrophic. He sued for peace soon after. The terms were harsh: he surrendered most of his fleet, paid 1,000 talents in indemnity, gave hostages (including his son Demetrius), and evacuated all Greek territories outside Macedonia. The kingdom itself survived—for now—as a Roman buffer state. The kingdom itself was allowed to stand—Rome wanted a living shield against the Balkans, not a graveyard.

The Battle of Cynoscephalae was more than a battle won; it was a demonstration. Polybius, who studied the clash closely, declared it the clearest proof yet of the Roman legion’s superiority over the Macedonian phalanx. The phalanx was a hammer—devastating on flat, open ground when whole and disciplined—but brittle when broken or on rough terrain. The Roman manipular system—flexible, adaptable, built for close-quarters sword fighting—thrived in the chaos of broken hills. A single tribune’s bold decision to strike the flank had turned a possible draw into decisive victory. The long shadow of Alexander’s invincible heavy infantry had begun to shorten. Rome had not just beaten Philip V; it had shown the Greek world that a new military order had arrived.


The Third Macedonian War: 172 - 168 BC
Demetrius returned from Rome speaking Latin, wearing the toga, and dreaming Roman dreams. He undermined his father’s careful defiance. Perseus, the elder brother and heir, seethed. In 180 BC Philip ordered Demetrius’ execution. The axe fell in a stone courtyard; the coppery smell of blood lingered for days. Philip never recovered. He died the next year, some whispered of a heart broken beyond mending. Perseus took the throne in 179 BC—tall, broad-shouldered, eyes burning with hate for Rome. He rebuilt the army; forges rang day and night with hammer on anvil, the air thick with charcoal smoke and sweat. He whispered anti-Roman words across Greece. Pergamum’s king denounced him. Rome listened.

The Third Macedonian War began in 172 BC. Early clashes were small—javelin volleys hissing through the air, horses screaming, the dull thump of bodies hitting dirt. At Callicinus in 171 BC Perseus claimed victory; Roman blood darkened the grass, though the result was murky. For two years the Romans battered against Macedonia’s mountain walls. In 168 BC Lucius Aemilius Paulus arrived. He led his legions through a supposedly impassable pass in the Olympus range—boots slipping on scree, lungs burning in thin air, the metallic taste of fear in every mouth. Perseus panicked and abandoned the position. He fell back to the Elpeus River, then to Pydna.

For months the two armies had stalked each other through the rugged spine of Macedonia. Lucius Aemilius Paullus, the Roman consul, had finally maneuvered Perseus out of his near-impregnable river line along the Elpeus. By clever flanking marches through supposedly impassable mountain trails—soldiers cursing as boots slipped on loose scree, lungs burning in the thin air, the metallic taste of exhaustion on every tongue—Paullus had forced Perseus to abandon strong positions and fall back toward the coastal plain south of Pydna.

Perseus encamped his 40,000-strong army (perhaps 25,000–30,000 in the phalanx core, backed by Thracian and mercenary auxiliaries, and 4,000 cavalry) on flat, open ground ideal for the sarissa-armed phalanx. The air carried the salt tang of the nearby Aegean, mixed with woodsmoke from campfires and the sharp musk of thousands of horses and men. Paullus positioned his smaller force—roughly 25,000–37,000 infantry plus 34 war elephants—on the lower slopes of Mount Olocrus, overlooking the plain. From there the Romans could smell the Macedonian cook-fires and hear the distant clatter of armor being polished. 

The decisive day began not with trumpets, but with a mule. Late in the morning of June 22, a Roman pack animal—perhaps spooked by heat or flies—broke loose and splashed across the shallow Leucus (or Elpeus) stream that separated the two camps. Paelignian allied troops, shouting and cursing in thick Italian accents, dashed after it. Thracian sentries on the Macedonian side jeered, then lunged. Javelins hissed through the air; bronze clanged on bronze; a man screamed as iron bit deep. Within minutes the petty scuffle had swollen into a full skirmish line—shouts, the wet thud of bodies hitting dirt, the coppery reek of fresh blood rising in the hot noon air.

Both commanders reacted swiftly. Perseus, fearing a Roman probe or a chance to crush the disorder, ordered his entire army to form up. Trumpets blared; the ground trembled as 16 ranks of phalangites lowered their 18-foot sarissas in unison, the forest of iron points flashing like a wall of silver under the merciless sun. Dust rose in choking clouds from thousands of hobnailed sandals and greaves. The Macedonian left was anchored by fierce Thracian warriors—lime-streaked hair streaming, curved swords drawn—while the right held lighter troops and cavalry. Paullus, watching from the hill, heard the rising roar and saw the Macedonian line spilling out of camp. He had no choice. Horns sounded; Roman centurions barked orders in clipped Latin. The legions and allies streamed down the slope—shields clanking, pila rattling in their grips, the low growl of men psyching themselves for slaughter. The battle had begun in the mid-afternoon, far later than any sensible general would choose.

The Macedonian phalanx advanced first, a living machine of bronze and wood. The front ranks locked shields; the sarissas dipped forward until five deadly points projected ahead of each man. The formation rolled across the plain like a steel tide, the rhythmic tramp of boots and the low chant of Greek war-songs carrying over the dust. For a terrifying moment it looked unstoppable. The Romans met them head-on. Legionaries hurled their pila in darkening clouds; the javelins thudded into shields and flesh with meaty thunks. Then the lines crashed. The phalanx drove forward, pushing the Roman front back step by bloody step. Men screamed as sarissas punched through mail and linen; the air filled with the iron stench of blood and the sour reek of fear-sweat. Paullus himself later admitted that he had never seen anything so frightening as that bristling wall of pikes bearing down on his men.

the Battle of Pydna
But the plain was not perfectly flat. Low ridges, dry gullies, and scattered scrub broke the ground. The phalanx—designed for level parade-ground discipline—began to lose cohesion. Gaps opened where one file stumbled while another pressed ahead. The sarissas, once a solid hedge, wavered and rose unevenly. Dust hung thick; men coughed and spat grit. The Macedonian formation, so invincible on flat ground, fractured into isolated knots. Paullus seized the moment. He ordered a feigned retreat over the roughest patches—legionaries backing away, shields raised, baiting the phalanx forward onto broken terrain. The Macedonians pressed, overextending. Then the Roman maniples poured into the gaps like wolves through a broken fence. Short gladii flashed in the dust-choked light; legionaries ducked under the long pikes, stabbing upward into groins, armpits, and throats. Blood sprayed in hot arcs across bronze breastplates. Men shrieked as iron tore through muscle and sinew. The once-solid phalanx dissolved into desperate hand-to-hand fighting—individual men hacking, stabbing, slipping in gore-slick grass.

On the Macedonian left, Roman allied troops and war elephants charged. The great beasts trumpeted, ears flapping, trunks swinging; their mahouts goaded them forward through the chaos. Thracians and mercenaries broke before the stench of elephant and the thunder of their feet. The Macedonian left collapsed in panic. Perseus, watching from horseback amid his royal guard, saw the center disintegrate. The phalanx that had carried Alexander across Asia was now a slaughter-pen. He fled the field with his cavalry, dust streaming behind him, leaving his infantry to die.

The killing lasted until dusk. Roman swords rose and fell in a red rhythm. The ground became a churned morass of blood, trampled entrails, and shattered sarissas. The air stank of ruptured bowels, spilled wine from broken canteens, and the sweet-iron reek of massacre. Some 20,000–25,000 Macedonians lay dead; another 11,000 were captured, many wounded and crawling. Roman losses were remarkably light—perhaps a few hundred—though the figure is almost certainly understated.  By nightfall the plain before Pydna was silent except for the groans of the dying and the crackle of Roman campfires. Perseus was hunted down days later, captured, and paraded in chains through Rome. The Antigonid kingdom ended that afternoon. Macedonia was divided into four client republics under Roman supervision. The long sarissas rusted in the dust; the dream of Alexander’s successors died amid the flies and the drying blood.

The Roman legion had proven—not for the first time, but decisively—that flexibility, initiative, and ruthless close-quarters swordsmanship could break even the most storied heavy infantry formation when the ground was uneven and the moment right. The Hellenistic age was over. Rome had become the unchallenged master of the Mediterranean world.

Sunday, February 22, 2026

sermon notes: Mark 9.14-23

Mark 9.14-23
An Exorcism

In this passage, Jesus and his three disciples come down from the Mount of Transfiguration, and he exorcises a demon from a boy. His other disciples, who had been given authority to cast out demons, had been unable to do it when Jesus and the three were gone. The disciples ask him why they weren't able to drive out the demon; Jesus responds that "this kind" can only come out by prayer. 

The primary form of spiritual warfare in the NT is primarily focused on truth over falsehood. This doesn't mean that there's no room for demons, possession and oppression, and exorcisms.

Jesus showcases his frustration with "this generation" (his other nine disciples); "How long do I have to put up with this?"

As soon as the father brings the boy to Jesus, the boy is thrown into convulsions. This isn't a display of power, or a taunt to Christ, but an act of desperation; the demon is squirming. All throughout the gospels, the demons are terrified of Jesus. They know who he is and have a grasp on what he is here to accomplish.

The father tells Jesus, "Help my unbelief!" He didn't wait to come to Jesus until he had no unbelief; no, he brought his unbelief to Christ and laid it out on the table. The father believed but also wrestled with unbelief; how often does this plague you and me? We can become worn down my life's trials, by sins in our lives, by our own weak frame. He knows we are made of dust and has pity on us. The boy's father shows us how to approach Christ - honestly and humbly, not pretending we have it all together when we don't. 

Jesus commands the demon, "Don't enter him again." The demon is exorcised, extracted from the boy, but the demon has the ability to reenter, which is why Christ expressly forbids it. The demon is exorcised and left to wander, to find a new host, and has been barred from the boy. 

What does Jesus mean when he says that 'this kind' can only come out by prayer? Two theories:
(1) Remember that the disciples had authority to exorcise demons, but this authority was theirs by virtue of their connection to Christ. It is possible that the disciples were leaning on their own power and authority, which was insufficient to the task at hand; they needed the power and authority of God, and it is by prayer that they connected with that power over the demon. This is why Jesus says all things are possible for they who believe; faith is the linchpin upon which successful exorcisms operate. 

(2) The disciples' early successes at casting out demons may have emboldened them, so that they are going about exorcisms without prayer! Maybe this worked for some, but it didn't work in the demon possessing this boy. Spiritual power isn't something we possess on our own and exercise at will; our spiritual power comes from Christ and is only there if we maintain our connection with Christ. 

There are three modern Christian views on demons:
(1) Charismatic view - demons lie behind every sin, failure, and misstep. Deliverance ministries become the core of pastoral care. 

(2) Minimalist view - yes, demons are real, because the Bible says so, but they don't do much. Most of what has been attributed to demons is mental illness and physical maladies.

(3) Historical view - demons are real, they do stuff, and they do a lot, but they don't do everything. 

 

Monday, February 16, 2026

the Sword, the Rock, and the Land: potent quotables

The Sword, the Rock, and the Land was an excellent little book - maybe a better term would be booklet - that dealt with politics, culture, and the current state of the western world. Here are some potent quotables broken down by subject:





Sunday, February 15, 2026

sermon notes: Mark 9.1-13

Mark 9.1-13 
The Transfiguration


Mark has been building the tension regarding Jesus' identity through the first half of Mark. In Mark 8, Peter makes a landmark confession: "You are the Christ." Jesus tells Peter he didn't come to this conclusion himself, but he was enlightened by the Spirit of God. At the Transfiguration, Jesus' identity is made crystal clear; the veil, so to speak, is pulled back. Halfway through Mark, the tension breaks: there's now no denying that Jesus is the Christ. 

The word 'transfiguration' comes from the Greek, and it means a change of form and essential nature, similar to metamorphosis. However, Jesus' nature and form isn't changing. Christ is one person with two complete natures, divine and human. This is an unveiling of his true nature, a revelation to the three disciples (Peter, James, and John) of what has been true all along. Glory isn't being added to Christ; His glory is being revealed.

In Mark 9.1 Jesus says some of those present won't taste death until they see the Kingdom of God coming with power. Then he takes some of them up a mountain - Peter, James, and John - for the experience. Why take three disciples and not the whole bunch? A couple ideas:
(a) Per Mosaic Law, three witnesses are required to verify the truth of something. The three disciples serve as a witnesses to the truth of Christ's glory.

(b) This is to encourage and prepare these specific disciples (Jesus' inner circle) for what's about to happen. The mountaintop experience will be followed by a dark valley.

(c) The Transfiguration reveals Christ's glory, and it contrasts with his prophecy of his humiliation at the end of Mark 8. Peter resists this - the Messiah is to do the opposite of that! - and Jesus identifies Peter as his adversary. The Transfiguration encourages Peter: despite the reality of what's about to go down, Jesus is indeed the Messiah! 


The three disciples were terrified. They were greatly afraid seeing Christ's glory. This was not a pleasant spiritual moment. It was similar to Isaiah's heavenly experience in the throne room of God, in which he was undone and cried out "Woe is me!" The voice of God shatters the stillness: "This is my beloved Son (an echo of Jesus' baptism). Listen to him!"

The Transfiguration connects with the giving of the Law on Mount Sinai in multiple ways:
(a) both take place on a mountain

(b) both have the voice of God speaking

(c) both have a cloud descending

(d) both have incredible radiance

(e) both have terrified witnesses

When Moses came down from Sinai, his face glowed from a borrowed glory; he had been close to the presence God, and his appearance was altered. Whereas Moses reflects God's glory, Jesus' glory radiates off of Him. He isn't reflecting God's glory; He is the source of that divine glory. 


"What's the deal with Moses and Elijah being present?" 
(a) These two represent the Law and the Prophets. 

(b) Moses and Elijah are the only Old Testament figures who had theophanies on a mountain.

(c) Both had unfinished expectations connected to them; Malachi, last OT prophet, mentions both, with roles in Messianic age; them being present with Christ echoes Malachi and informs us that the Messianic Age has come!

The Household and the War for the Cosmos: Potent Quotables

Potent Quotables from Aaron Renn's remastering of John Owen's classic 
The Mortification of Sin into modern English.


ON PIETAS
I am old enough to remember when preachers promoted piety—particularly those whose vocabulary had been formed by reading 18th century evangelists like John Wesley or George Whitfield. In the old days people believed in the meanings of words, and they stuck with them. And if a person didn’t understand a word, you defined it for them. And if he didn’t like its meaning, you’d try to help him see the value of the word anyway. Imagine that. I can recall when people changed their minds about the word piety. Younger men began to prefer younger sounding terms. The word devotions was popular. Later, more sophisticated people preferred the term spiritual disciplines. Publishers really ran with that for a while. But folksy youth pastor types liked Quiet Time, QT for short. There has been something of a downgrade here, even with spiritual disciplines. Can you detect it? Words retain an aftertaste, even when the old meanings are lost. Originally, piety said something like a mode of life. QT is for your to-do list.

Now, religion is another word that has fallen out of favor. The Latin root, religio, means to bind. Is it any wonder that the apostles to popular culture now insist that “Christianity is not a religion; it is a relationship”?... As wonderful as a personal relationship with Jesus is, the people that show the most enthusiasm for it do not give much thought to all the things that have to be in place in order for it to be possible. Take the Bible, for instance, or the sacraments, or the creeds, or even prayer. All of these things must be in place before you can even imagine having a personal relationship with Jesus... No, you cannot reduce Christianity to a relationship; it is bigger than that. Religion really is a better word than relationship for describing what it is.

While losing words is a big problem you don’t actually need to lose a word to lose a meaning. You can obscure it by the subtle misuse of a word. And over time a new meaning can actually overshadow the original. It can even contradict it. You can see this with the word freedom, for example. Once it meant taking care of oneself. Now it means making other people support your choices.


What we are left with today is heart religion, because now the heart is the only place Jesus can be publicly acknowledged to live.


[The] original Gnostics taught that the physical world was made by a clumsy and malevolent god, and that salvation consists in escaping from his creation by coming to know your true spiritual self. While most people are not Gnostics in this sense, Gnosticism-lite is pretty common. Gnosticism-lite cannot see how the physical world can communicate spiritual truths. Instead, spiritual insight is found within the garden of the heart.

Here’s the scene as described by Bernard Knox, Director Emeritus of Harvard’s Center for Hellenistic Studies, “After realizing the fighting was no longer of use, that Troy was doomed, [Aeneas] carried his father, Anchises, on his shoulders out of the burning city, holding his son Ascanius by the hand, with his wife, Creusa, following behind.”... While they would have admired the picture, I don’t think that this is what the preachers of my youth had in mind when they talked about piety. They talked about Bibles, and notebooks, and being alone with God, preferably in the woods on a summer day. So, what were the Romans thinking of when they called this piety? Here’s Bernard Knox again, The word pius does indeed refer, like its English derivative, to devotion and duty to the Divine; this is the reason cited by Poseidon in the Iliad for saving Aeneas from death at the hand of Achilles. And in the Aeneid he is always mindful of the gods, constant in prayer and thanks, and dutiful in sacrifice. But the words pius and pietas have in Latin a wider meaning. Perhaps the best English equivalent is something like “dutiful,” “mindful of one’s duty”—not only to the gods but also to one’s family and to one’s country.

[The] idea conveyed by the word pietas was not unique to the Romans. For example, Greeks had a word that had almost an identical meaning, and in Acts 17:23, the Apostle Paul used it to commend the Athenians. It is a form of ευσεβεω, and that word means, “to act reverently towards God, one’s country, magistrates, relations, and to all whom dutiful regard or reverence is due.”10 What should impress us about both words is their comprehensive nature. They didn’t promote a withdrawal from the world; they did just the opposite. That’s because people didn’t divide the world into religious and nonreligious categories. For people in the first century the world was a cosmos, a sacred order; and it was filled with other beings, some of whom were people, while others were gods. And you owed them. Piety paid its debts.

[We] practice something novel in the history of the world, what we call the “separation of Church and state.” Romans would have considered that impious. In fact, Romans believed pietas justified their right to rule the world. Here’s Cicero, the great orator and politician in the Roman Senate, making the case: . . . who, once convinced that divinity does exist, can fail at the same time to be convinced that it is by [divine] power that this great empire has been created, extended, and sustained? However good be our conceit of ourselves, conscript fathers, we have neither excelled the Spaniards in population, nor Gauls in vigor, nor Carthaginians in versatility, nor Greeks in art; but in piety, in devotion to religion [sed pietate ac religione], and in that special wisdom which consists in the recognition of the truth that the world is swayed and directed by divine power, we have excelled every race and every nation.

The thing about pietas that you can’t miss is its social character. It didn’t isolate you; instead it bound you to everything else. It was the glue of the world: things divine and human things, matter and spirit, the past and the future, [and] the generations. 


ON COSMOS
Paul and his Roman audience didn’t see the cosmos in the same way that Carl Sagan did. The cosmos was more than matter in motion for them. It was an ordered thing—the largest order of them all. That’s what the word actually meant. It included everything, even invisible things. And it also housed microcosms—little orders that depended on and reflected the larger one. If they didn’t, they couldn’t exist.

With the gods of antiquity, order was called for so that the gods could have a suitable place to live. This captures a valuable insight that is reflected in the Latin word for house—the word domus. Not only is that the root of the word domestic, it is also the root of the word dominion. In the same way, the cosmos is like a great house, one that is divinely ordered.

First, we lost the cosmological basis for the household. Then we lost its economic basis. And now the biological basis is being deconstructed through technology and gender-bending word games. In a world where you can order sperm from a catalog, and it is possible to have three biological parents, can father and mother or male and female mean anything normative?

People once believed that the cosmos was a crowded place, filled with everything from sprites to archangels—a grand, towering structure reaching up and out of sight. And there we were, in the middle of it all. It was an ennobling place to live. But today most of us think of the cosmos as empty space. In our minds it has become somewhat like Detroit—a vacant city, crumbling all around. The old gods are long gone, and even Christians have a hard time believing in angels. And when it comes to Jesus, He lives with us inwardly, in the garden of the heart.

The cosmos has a future. There will be a new Heaven and a new earth. Elements of the original cosmos will carry over, and that is really good news because the redeemed are included in what gets carried over. We live by the light of tomorrow’s sun, and that sun is the Lord God (Rev. 22:5). This is the basis of our piety, the substance of our daily duties.


ON HOUSEHOLD CODES
I never gave the New Testament household codes much thought until I noticed how scrupulously people try to avoid them. That’s when I began to suspect that they could be indispensable... I suspect that [the household codes] embarrass most pastors in the Western world. They are terribly undemocratic, and in the language of our day, they’re definitely sexist and classist. Most contemporary commentators inform us that the codes were a concession to the prejudices of the time. Just why Paul should do this when he could instigate a riot just by showing his face, people don’t care to discuss.

Biblical scholarship sure isn’t what it used to be. At its highest levels it is entirely captive to feminists and their allies. I can recall when they began to assume their chairs at various schools. At first things were not too bad. They had their opinions and you had yours. Now you’re not allowed to have yours. There is a tendentious character to their research. The goal isn’t so much to discern the meaning of a text, but instead to uncover hidden agendas. Some have labeled it the hermeneutic of suspicion. Hermeneutics is the practice of interpretation. And there are different schools of thought when it comes to how to go about it. The hermeneutic of suspicion assumes the worst about people, especially when it comes to the role of ancient texts in antiquity. Instead of demonstrating that someone in the past was preoccupied with securing his own interests at the expense of others, it assumes he was... any defense that is proffered by others that is based on the exigencies on the ground is just kicked aside as rationalization. Some scholars go along with this because they’re afraid to lose their jobs. But many scholars are not so pusillanimous: they enjoy pillorying the dead.

[The] real problem people have with the household codes: they don’t believe that the sacrifices that they call for are worth making. They don’t believe that households serve a higher purpose than the personal goals of the individuals that live in them.

What we really need is a recovery of a way of life. The codes outlined a way to order our households so that they can serve as microcosms of the largest order of them all... Our households need to recover what made them strong in the past. And to do this you must have a man of the house and a code to guide him so that he can order his house.


In the Ten Commandments the command to honor parents implied the duty to care for them in their old age. This isn’t a matter of debate. Commentators as far back as you can go all agree.


Today an inheritance is whatever is left in the bank when your parents’ assets are liquidated and the bills are paid. Most people do not inherit a farm, or an apartment building, or a business. But in old-fashioned households, property bound the generations together. No wonder honoring parents made for a long life; when you served them you served yourself—and hopefully your children would do the same.


[A] household ordered by the household code in Ephesians reflects the rule of Christ.


Let’s admit it, submission can be very disagreeable no matter who the man is; even when he is the image of the invisible God. But submission is required. It is always required. Every human institution in the history of the world has been held together by it... [But] you can’t build anything on rebellion. Submission will eventually be called for: armies can’t win without submission, and football teams can’t score without submission, and children can’t learn math without submission, and businesses can’t make a profit without submission. We can be honest about it, or we can try to hide it—this is life. And it is true for the house of God, and for the households we live in.


ON CHRISTENDOM
Heaven had not come to earth; that civilization had its faults, its sins—but on the scale of relative goods, it was the best there ever was. But it was destroyed by a new way of seeing. No, the invention of the telescope didn’t destroy that civilization. Atheism should get the blame for undermining it—atheism, that way of seeing that doesn’t see. Atheists tell us that there is no intrinsic meaning to things because there is no God to give them meaning.


First we lost the gods, then we lost the one true God, and now we’re losing ourselves. We’re dying.


What becomes of people when they turn away from the light? They deform. Things lose proportion; little things swell grotesquely, while other things that were meant to be large and vigorous, shrivel. At least the old pagans had things to focus their minds upon; today we stare into the void.

One of the things that conservatives should conserve is the belief that history has a Governor. As awful as things can be, Someone is ordering things to their given ends. Even the age that we live in serves a purpose in the great scheme of things. This means that we are the true progressives.


ON SLAVERY
Western civilization did not invent slavery. It can’t even claim to have perfected it. The only claim that Western civilization can make when it comes to slavery is that it is the first civilization that figured out a way to live without it.

There were two sources for slaves: debt and displacement. Debt is fairly easy to understand. Sometimes people need things that they can’t pay for, so they borrow what they need and promise to pay the debt back later. Later arrives, and they can’t pay for one reason or another. What to do? A lender could forgive the debt, that’s true. But if he does that, he has effectively paid the debt himself. What if he doesn’t want to, or simply can’t forgive the debt for one reason or another, what then? If the debtor put up no collateral, then the lender must put the debtor to work.

returning to displacement, apart from man-stealing—something condemned in the Old Testament, by the way—people could be displaced in a variety of ways: warfare, natural disaster, pestilence, the death of a father, and so on. When these things happened relatives would take you in, ideally. But what if they couldn’t, or just wouldn’t?.. Just try to imagine yourself in the shoes of someone who has lost everything. Your choices might be beggary, crime, or being taken into a household as some form of servant, either on a temporary basis, or permanently. Which would you choose?

Xenophon condemned the harsh treatment of slaves... even Aristotle could longingly speculate about a world with robots, and other forms of automation, that would make slavery obsolete.


GUERILLA PIETY
Christians have been given suits of armor and they are duty-bound to fight for the household of God. But like Christians in the first century we are hopelessly overmatched on the ground. The principalities continue to rage against the Lord of the Cosmos. Their inhuman machinery menaces us, particularly in the West. The state continues to grow and centralize, technology tracks us (and increasingly it is used to manipulate us), progressive multinational corporations standardize us and commodify us, popular media seek to indoctrinate us and addict us, and state-run education and healthcare are eliminating private rivals so as to make us ever more dependent on government largess. All of these things and more are arrayed against us. In spite of all of these things, Christ has already won. He is our Lord and we are engaged in a long obedience. We wrestle with His enemies.

Word and sacrament serve as a stairway to Heaven, as well as a virtual time machine. When believers worship they rise to heavenly places where they are seated with the risen Lord. They are also sent into the past to sit at the feet of the prophets and the apostles, and they are also flung into the future, where by faith they dimly discern, as though a glass, a day when all things will be done on earth as they are in Heaven.

[Fight] the good fight. Go home, build a house, and if you do it in the right way, you will give the world a glimpse of things to come. There is nothing more terrifying to the principalities than this. Because in the end, the principalities will bow and confess the Lordship of Christ, and if your house is ordered well, it is a reminder of that glorious day (Phil. 2:10–11). And, as hard as it is to imagine, when, at the end of the war for the cosmos, the tribunal for war-crimes is impaneled, you and I will have our seats behind the bench (1 Cor. 6:3).

Sunday, February 08, 2026

sermon notes: Mark 8.1-38

The Feeding of the 4000
: Mark 8.1-21
Jesus has compassion on the crowds. Jesus has compassion and care for people. The people are hungry, and he's worried they will faint - so he provides for their need. Jesus' compassion is practical; he doesn't just care about our spiritual health, but the little mundane things as well. 

Jesus is a good shepherd; he gives people what they need. He will provide the masses with food and then, in the next breath, directly and intentionally offend them! The church, as Christ's body, must always be reminding people of their sin and call them to faith and repentance. The church cares about the practical things, like Jesus; but also cares about the ultimate things (again: like Christ).

Signs and wonders (miracles) are a form of communication: a sign pointing to something wonderful! Jesus isn't a showman; he isn't doing miracles for popularity. The point of miracles isn't just to help people, or show his power; miracles confirm the authenticity of his teachings and point the way to the in-breaking Kingdom of God. 

In the Reformed world, we like to pat each other on the back and point to all the problems outside us: Arminianism, charismatic Pentecostalism, Catholicism, transgenderism, Zionism - but we ignore the sins in our own camp. We pride ourselves on being "right" (or so we think) and speak and think poorly of those with other convictions or practices. This breeds a form of legalism - "You must be a five point Calvinist or you're going to hell!" - and results in an anemic and fragile Christian life. 

The leaven of the Pharisees and of Herod refers to their pride and unbelief; yeast (or leaven) spreads through a whole loaf of bread and makes it rise. Similarly, pride and unbelief in one's heart will spread until our hearts are darkened, and we can't perceive and understand spiritual things. This results in a hardened heart that is closed off to the reality of the gospel. Jesus asks the people "Do you not see? Do you not understand?" in an echo of the OT prophets, putting the people in the place of the Israelites who rejected the messages of the prophets.


A Blind Man Healed and Peter's Confession: Mark 8.22-30
Jesus heals a blind man in two stages: first, he spits in the man's eye. The man says he can still somewhat see, but it isn't great. Jesus then touches the man's eyes, and he's healed completely. We know Jesus can heal someone immediately, so what's this about? One explanation is that this is an intentional picture of sanctification: our sanctification doesn't happen all at once but comes in stages. The onward march of sanctification is herky-jerky. 

Another explanation is that this is a picture of the revelation happening with the disciples: they are dull but slowly coming around to perceive Christ, in bits and pieces, as the divine Messiah. This second explanation makes sense with the next episode, in which the disciples talk about how people are debating who Jesus is - a prophet? John the Baptist? Elijah? - but it is Peter whose eyes are opened and who exclaims, "You are the Christ!"


The Cost of Following Christ: Mark 8.31-38
Jesus explicitly tells his disciples that he will be rejected by Israel's leadership and will be killed - but he'll rise again after three days. Jesus rebukes Jesus to his face and is in turn rebuked and called "Satan." The name Satan can mean Adversary, and here Jesus identifies Peter as his adversary. Peter had a moment of clarity just before, acknowledging his Messiahship, but now his vision is clouded again. He expects, like most good Jews, that the Messiah will lead a political revolution and establish Israel as the world's imperial ruler.

Jesus then begins talking about beating the cross: following Christ will cost you friends, family, comfort, worldly opportunities, and much more. Peter expected that following Jesus would put him on the front lines of a politically triumphant movement; Jesus clarifies that it involves bearing one's cross, carrying one's own execution stake. Having just established that he would die, Jesus now hints at what that entails: Roman crucifixion. In legendarium foreshadowing, Peter would indeed carry his own cross (Peter was allegedly crucified upside down). 

Those who follow Jesus must be willing to lose "their life." This means we need to be willing to lose prestige and popularity. We need to be willing to be hated by those who are deceived by sin and the Devil, whose hearts are hardened; we need to be okay with being a loser. If we cannot stomach that, we cannot be saved. Jesus says that those who are ashamed of him and his words will be put to shame when he comes in glory with the angels.

The Children's Westminster Catechism: Question 3

Question: Why did God make you and all things?
  
Answer: For His glory. 


In the previous lessons learned that God made us and all things. Here we learn why He made all things: for His glory. This is important, because God has given us a mission in life: to glorify Him. As the Apostle Paul puts it, ‘So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.’ (1 Corinthians 10:31) And this isn’t just what we are here for; it’s what all of creation is made for! The heavens are designed to declare the glory of God (Psalm 19:1); the whole earth is filled with His glory (Isaiah 6:3), and in the future the whole earth will be filled with the knowledge of God’s glory (Habakkuk 2:14). 

God’s glory is a big deal in the Bible, but what is the glory of God? One way to understand God’s glory is that it is His greatness, character, presence, and power put on display. It is the full potency of God for all to see. When the Bible tells us that all of creation glorifies God, it’s telling us that the world reveals God’s greatness, character, presence, and power. We already know creation does this, because in the previous lesson we learned about how the natural world tells people about God’s existence and what He is like (Romans 1:20). Because the glory of God is the public display of His attributes, it isn’t surprising that Jesus Christ is pictured as the glory of God, because He is a full revelation of God and His attributes. John 1:14 says, ‘The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.’ The Apostle John continues and writes, ‘No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared him.’ Hebrews 1:3 puts it this way: ‘[Christ] is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word.’ Jesus is the fullest revelation of God that we have! When we listen to the gospel stories and hear about Jesus doing miracles, and casting out demons, and teaching in parables, we are seeing the Living God at work among His beloved creatures. It’s a wonderful perspective to have when hearing Jesus stories!

The glory of God is God’s full potency – His existence, His greatness, His character, His presence, and His power – put on display.

However, though all of creation tells us about God, not everyone listens to the message; in Romans 1.21-22, just after establishing that creation is a megaphone announcing God’s existence and power, Paul says that people ‘did not glorify [God], nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man – and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.’ Instead of glorifying God, sinful people reject what creation plainly tells them, and by doing so their foolish hearts are darkened. As a result, we live in a world that shouts God’s glory while some people acknowledge that glory and others refuse to see it. This won’t always be the case, however; as the prophet Habakkuk promised, a day is coming not only when the whole earth will be filled with God’s glory (for it already is!) but with the knowledge of that glory; in other words, a day is coming when all people everywhere will listen to what creation is saying and acknowledge God’s glory and bow down to Him.

Monday, February 02, 2026

The Battle of First Bull Run: 21 July 1861


A Clamor for Blood  -  A Parade into Virginia  -  Odd Femininity at Fairfax  -
The Skirmish at Blackburn's Ford  -  McDowell's Plan B  -  A Night March  -  The Skirmish
at the Stone Bridge  -  Chaos at Sudley Springs  -  The Struggle for Matthews Hill  -
Henry House Hill  -  'Stonewall'  Jackson  -  The Union Retreat  -  'The Picnic Battle'  -  Long Days Ahead


Battle Plans
The First Battle of Bull Run occurred on 21 July 1861 in Prince William County, Virginia, just thirty miles southwest of Washington, D.C. and just north of the city of Manassas. This was the first major battle of the American Civil War, and it was the largest and bloodiest battle in U.S. history up to that point. The Federals and Confederates had different preferences for naming battles; whereas the Confederacy tended to name battles after the town that served as their base, Union armies named battles after a landmark closest to their own lines, usually a river or a stream. In this case, the North referred to the battle as ‘Bull Run’ (after the stream by the same name), and that name has stuck since the North was eventually victorious and had the privilege of writing the history. The Confederates called this battle the Battle of Manassas, and the ‘First’ was tagged onto the name after another battle was fought in the same area in 1862.  

Just months after the fall of Fort Sumter near Charleston, South Carolina, the northern public clamored for a march against the Confederate capital of Richmond, Virginia. Capturing the Confederate capital, it was thought, would bring a decisive end to the Confederacy. The Union’s General-in-Chief, Winfield Scott, advocated caution; remembering the unprofessionalism of amateur troops during the War of 1812, he had reason to doubt the short-term enlisted soldiers were capable of a successful march and capture of Richmond. He suggested that the Union place a stranglehold on the Confederacy via a naval blockade and spend its time training up its new soldiers to proficiency before throwing them into the wolf’s lair. Scott’s so-called ‘Anaconda Plan’ would eventually be adopted, but in July of 1861, Lincoln felt it best to yield to public pressure: he ordered an advance into Virginia of Union troops under Brigadier General Irvin McDowell (pictured below and to the left). The Federals knew that the Confederates were camped nearby at Manassas Junction, where the Orange and Alexandria Railroad and the Manassas Gap Railroad met; the Confederates under P.T. Beauregard straddled the railroad, which was an artery connecting them with the Army of the Shenandoah. 

McDowell’s initial plan was to invade Virginia in three columns; with two columns he would make a diversionary attack on Beauregard while the third column moved southward around the Confederate left flank to cut the railroad to Richmond, preventing reinforcements from reaching Beauregard’s trapped army. He hoped to force Beauregard to abandon Manassas Junction and retreat to the Rappahannock River, which would relieve pressure off D.C. Meanwhile, Major General Robert Patterson’s 18,000 men were tasked with pinning down General Joseph Johnston’s Army of the Shenandoah so that they couldn’t reinforce Beauregard before the railroad was cut. Patterson seemed up to the task: on 2 July eight thousand of his men faced off against four thousand Confederates under Thomas Jackson at the Battle of Hoke’s Run. Jackson’s men put up a spirited defense, but the weight in numbers told, and they executed an organized retreat. The next day Patterson occupied Martinsburg and remained there for nearly two weeks. He was supposed to go to Winchester to keep Johnston’s forces pinned down, but instead he retreated to Harper’s Ferry; this freed up Johnston to be able to reinforce Beauregard at the coming battle. 

Unbeknownst to McDowell, Beauregard (pictured below to the right) knew what he was up to. The year before, U.S. Army captain Thomas Jordan created a pro-Southern spy network in D.C. He recruited Rose O’Neal Greenhow, a well-connected socialite. He provided her with a code for messages and gave her control of his network before leaving D.C. to throw in with the Confederacy. Jordan’s spy  network largely relied on southern belles riding fast horses, and Greenhow managed to evade Union pickets and deliver McDowell’s plans to Beauregard. Beauregard began preparing a defensive position along the Bull Run, a spring-fed muddy stream flowing southward through eastern Virginia. 


A Parade into Virginia
When the Union march began, it looked more like a holiday parade than an advance to war. Federal nurse S. Emma E. Edmonds remembered: ‘In gay spirits the army moved forward, the air resounding with the music of the regimental bands and patriotic songs of the soldiers. No gloomy forebodings seemed to damp the spirits of the men for a moment… “On to Richmond!” was echoed and re-echoed…’ The soldiers left D.C. carrying about fifty pounds of equipment. They marched in files with white-topped supply wagons and dark-hued ambulances keeping them company. Also keeping them company were scores of civilians; John G. Nicolay, private secretary to President Lincoln, remembered: ‘The business of war was such a novelty that McDowell’s army accumulated an extraordinary number of camp-followers and non-combatants. The vigilant newspapers of the chief cities sent a cloud of correspondents to chronicle the incidents of the march and conflict. The volunteer regiments carried with them… companionships unknown to regular armies… [S]enators and representatives… in several instances joined in what many rashly assumed would be a mere triumphal parade.’ The unseasoned troops moved in stops and starts; halts at the head of a column undulated accordionlike to the rear, where men got tired of standing for hours in the sun and wandered off to find water or fruit. Officers snapped at them to remain in their ranks, but they ignored them, set on procuring apples and blackberries. McDowell bitterly complained, ‘[The troops] stopped every moment to pick blackberries or get water; they would not keep in the ranks, order as much as you pleased. When they came where water was fresh, they would pour the old water out of their canteens and fill them with fresh water. They were not used to denying themselves much; they were not used to journeys on foot.’ Being unused to extensive marching, it isn’t surprising that it would take them three days to cover a distance that these same soldiers could cover in a day this time next year. They were also slowed down by having to clear trees felled into the road by southerners, and often the columns stopped to seek cover from hidden enemy artillery batteries that simply weren’t there. Imagination ran amuck. 

That first day McDowell’s troops reached the town of Fairfax, Virginia. Nurse Edmunds remembered: ‘Some built fires while others went in search of, and appropriated, every available article which might in any way add to the comfort of hungry and fatigued men. The whole neighborhood was ransacked for milk, butter, eggs, poultry, etc… There might have been heard some stray shots fired in the direction of a field where a drove of cattle were quietly grazing; and soon after the odor of fresh steak was issuing from every part of the camp.’ Such raiding was contrary to McDowell’s orders, along with episodic barn-burning and vandalization that further soured the southern occupants against their Union occupiers. In a strange incidence, several soldiers pilfered female clothing, dressed themselves, and strutted around town to the tune of laughter from their compatriots. Union journalist George Wilkes was offended when ‘a fellow passed by with a pair of ladies’ ruffled drawers hauled up over his pantaloons.’ Upon reaching the town of Centreville the next day, McDowell scouted Beauregard’s enemy lines to the west. He was irritated to find that Bueauregard was well-entrenched on the opposite bank of Bull Run, with his left anchored on a stone bridge spanning the stream. Beuregard had congregated the bulk of his forces around the bridge and other fords so that any Union advance across Bull Run would be met with withering fire. A disgruntled McDowell would have to come up with a different plan of attack, and he had his eye on the Confederate left. 


The Skirmish at Blackburn's Ford
The next day, 18 July, McDowell dispatched a division under Brigadier General Daniel Tyler to reconnoiter Beauregard’s right flank. Though his task was one of reconnaissance, he was dragged into a skirmish at Blackburn’s Ford on Bull Run. Tyler reached the ford at about eleven in the morning; the ford appeared shallow enough to ford, and it seemed that it was undefended; unbeknownst to him, Confederate Brigadier General James Longstreet had a brigade tucked into the woods just beyond the opposite bank. As Tyler continued spying out the woods across the stream, he was able to identify a few pieces of Confederate artillery. He ordered Union howitzers to fire on them. The howitzer did little, but there was no reply from the woods. Tyler, thinking it was only lightly defended, ordered five regiments – one Massachusetts regiment, three Michigan regiments, and a New York regiment – across the stream. The 1st Massachusetts led the way, and as they were pushing through the shallow stream, the woods on the opposite bank lit up with spouts of flame and acrid white smoke. Minie balls began whizzing through the air, splashing into the stream, cracking overhead, and for some unlucky soldiers, finding soft cushion in human flesh. Charles Carleton Coffin, a correspondent for the Boston Journal, was with Tyler in a peach orchard near a small house that overlooked the ford. He reported:
Suddenly there comes a volley from beneath the green foliage along the winding stream, and the air is thick with leaden rain. A white cloud rises above the trees, and a wild yell – not a cheer, not a hurrah, but more like the war whoop of the painted warrior of the Western plains – is heard above the din of battle. It was Longstreet’s brigade, delivering its first volley and sending out its first battle-cry.

Tyler ordered his artillery moved closer to the action, and at the same time the Confederate artillery that had survived the howitzer rounds began to open up (at Blackburn’s Ford alone, Tyler’s artillery would fire 415 cannon-balls, and the Confederate artillery would fire 310). A New York lieutenant, Joseph Favill, recounts the experience:
Suddenly a loud screeching noise overhead sent more than half the regiment pell mell to the other side of a fence that ran along the road side. Here we crouched down flat on our bellies, just as a shell exploded a little beyond us. It was from the rebel batteries in front, and the first any of us had ever heard, and it certainly did seem a terrible thing, rushing through the air like an immense sky rocket, then bursting into a thousand pieces, carrying death and destruction to everything in its course. 

Forced to concede that the Confederates had strong control of the opposite bank, Tyler ordered his men to retreat back across the ford. As they were falling back, Confederate reinforcements under Colonel Jubal A. Early arrived to reinforce Longstreet. The Confederate artillery kept the Federalists under fire as they retreated from the ford. General Beauregard recounts that many ‘were plainly seen to break and scatter [as] our parting shells were thrown among them.’ One of Tyler’s little-known brigade commanders, Colonel William Tecumseh Sherman, remembered how ‘for the first time in my life I saw cannon-balls strike men and crash through the trees and saplings above and around us.’ Tyler’s men suffered 83 casualties from the skirmish while the Confederates suffered 68. Tyler reported to McDowell that he couldn’t cross the stream, leaving McDowell with little choice to focus on the Confederate left flank. In the days after the skirmish, two New York soldiers would be awarded the Medal of Honor for their bravery at the ford, and both Longstreet and Early would claim that the skirmish ‘went a long way towards winning the victory [of First Manassas], for it gave our troops confidence in themselves.’ 


McDowell's Plan B
Tyler’s news from Blackburn’s Ford irritated McDowell, but it didn’t give him the same consternation as rumors that Confederate General Johnston (pictured to the right) had slipped past Patterson and was heading for Manassas to link up with Beauregard, bolstering the southern forces to 34,000 on paper. These rumors conflicted with his reports from Patterson, who insisted that Johnston was still tied down in Winchester; unfortunately for McDowell, the rumors were correct. That very morning, 18 July, just hours before the skirmish at Blackburn’s Ford, Johnston received a telegram suggesting he go to Beauregard’s aid. Johnston was able to oblige, as Patterson’s men were trekking towards Harper’s Ferry. That very afternoon Johnston began marching out of Winchester while Stuart’s cavalry screened Patterson’s men. In a twist of irony, an hour after Johnson departed Winchester, Patterson telegraphed Washington, D.C., ‘I have succeeded, in accordance with the wishes of the General-in-Chief, in keeping General Johnston’s force at Winchester.’ If the rumors were correct (and they were), that meant McDowell had to act fast; this compounded the pressure he felt due to the 90-day enlistments of many of his men set to expire (in the wake of Fort Sumter, Lincoln had issued a proclamation on 15 April for 75,000 men to serve for three months, and that expiration date was fast approaching). 

McDowell’s battle map captured the enemy placements: proceeding northwest from Blackburn’s Ford, the Bull Run crossings lay at Michell’s Ford, Island Ford, Ball’s Ford, Lewis Ford, the Stone Bridge, Poplar (or Farm) Ford, and Sudley Springs Ford. These fords, in particular the Stone Bridge, were heavily defended by Confederate forces. McDowell seized upon a plan to throw his weight against the Confederate left flank. Tyler, who had tangled with Longstreet at the ford, was tasked with leading his division across the stone bridge on the Confederate right flank. His mission was to keep the right flank occupied while two divisions under Brigadier Generals David Hunter and Samuel P. Heintzelman crossed the Bull Run to the northwest at Sudley Springs; from the Springs, these two Union divisions could outflank the Confederate left and march into the enemy’s rear. Though the plan was straightforward on paper, it required closely-timed synchronization of troop movements and attacks, and this was asking a lot of 90-day soldiers and militia with little training or experience. This plan also assumed that the camp rumors about Johnston were untrue and that Patterson’s telegraph to D.C. was accurate: Johnston, McDowell chose to believe, was still in Winchester. 


The Battle Begins
On 19-20 July, Johnston’s forces began reinforcing Beauregard. Johnston’s men had boarded trains at Piedmont Station and rode the tracks as fast as possible to Manassas Junction. This was the first time in history that troops had been transported to a battle by train. By the end of the 20th, most of Johnston’s men had reached the junction. Beauregard had been forming a plan in which the Confederates would surge across Blackburn’s Ford and push their way towards the Federals at Centreville. Johnston, as the senior officer between the two, approved the plan, and to this end he posted most of his Shenandoah men near Blackburn’s Ford. Thus both the Union and Confederacy, staring at each other across Virginia’s sluggish Bull Run, were planning attacks on each other; now it boiled down to which army made the first move, and that was McDowell’s.

In the early morning of 21 July, McDowell launched his attack: 12,000 men – the divisions of Hunter and Heintzelman – began the six-mile northwestern trek towards Sudley Springs that would, it was hoped, take them around the enemy’s left flank. At the same time Tyler’s division of 8,000 men left Centreville and aimed for the Stone Bridge. Having set off at 2:30A, in the dead of night long before the rising of the new day’s sun, the inexperienced troops almost immediately began fumbling. Tyler’s division blocked the advance of the flanking columns on the Warrenton Turnpike; when the flanking columns reached the roads that would take them to Sudley Springs, they discovered the ‘roads’ were just cart paths, making it difficult for the narrow files of soldiers to make good time, and even more difficult for the artillery and ambulances to make it from Point A to Point B without much cursing and struggling. As dawn began to break, Nurse Edmunds, accompanying ambulatory wagons towards Sudley Springs, remembered how ‘…column after column wounds its way over the green hills and through the hazy valleys, with the soft moonlight falling on the long lines of shining steel. Not a drum or bugle was heard during the march, and the deep silence was only broken by the rumbling of artillery, the muffled tread of infantry, or the low hum of thousands of subdued voices.’ New Yorker Edmund Clarence Stedman reflected, ‘The spirit of the soldiery was magnificent… There was glowing rivalry between the men of different states. “Old Massachusetts will not be ashamed of us tonight.” “Wait till the Ohio boys get at them.” “We’ll fight for New York today,” and a hundred similar utterances were shouted from the different ranks.’ 

Beauregard was eating breakfast at the Wilmer McLean house near Mitchell’s Ford when he heard the rumble of enemy artillery; moments later, a few rounds crashed through the house. A startled Beauregard realized the enemy was on the move, and he ordered demonstration attacks north towards the Union left at Centreville, hoping that this would blunt the Union advance until he could get a grasp of the situation.[1] Bungled orders and poor communications resulted in his subordinates receiving wrong information, no information, or mixed information, stunting the initial Confederate response. Meanwhile, Tyler’s men reached the Stone Bridge around six that morning, and the flanking divisions under Hunter and Heintzelman began fording Bull Run two miles upriver at an unguarded ford around 9:30A. 

All that stood in the path of the Federal flanking columns at Sudley Spring was South Carolinian Colonel Nathan ‘Shanks’ Evans and his brigade of 1100 men guarding the Confederate left flank. Evans had won the ‘Shanks’ moniker at West Point as a mocking reference to his spindly legs, and he was known for having an orderly follow him around with a keg of whiskey he’d nicknamed ‘barrelito.’ Hours earlier he had dispatched some of his men towards the Stone Bridge upon learning that the Federals were there. Virginian Private John Goode, posted at the Stone Bridge, recounted: ‘Before sunrise… great clouds of dust might be seen… plainly indicating that the enemy were advancing; and soon the roar of heavy artillery was heard; shot and shell came screaming like lost spirits through the air; and the advancing hosts were momentarily expected to appear.’ Tyler’s men didn’t press forward across the bridge, indicating to Beauregard that Tyler was simply demonstrating to keep the Confederates away from the main attack. This was confirmed when his signal officer E.P. Alexander, stationed eight miles southwest at the Wilcoxen Farm on Signal Hill, telegrammed his superior that he had seen the glint of cannon barrels and bayonets moving beyond the Confederate left flank (this was the first use of wig-wag semaphore signaling in combat). Alexander told Beauregard, ‘Look out for your left, your position is turned.’ Evans reacted immediately, leading 900 of his men away from the Stone Bridge and down farm lanes to a new location on a low rise to the northwest called Matthews Hill.

the Stone Bridge at Bull Run where Tyler's men were posted


The Struggle for Matthews Hill
Charles Coffin of the Boston Journal was placed with Tyler’s men. He reported: ‘Looking south you could see clouds of dust floating over the forest trees. The Rebels have discovered the movement and are marching in hot haste [from several points along the Bull Run line] to resist the impending attack… Rebel officers ride furiously and shout their orders. The artillerymen lash their horses to a run. The infantry are also upon the run, sweating and panting in the hot sunshine.’ Evans was the vanguard of the Confederate response, but he knew his paltry 900 men didn’t stand a chance holding Matthews Hill against the Federals who outnumbered his men by twelve. Evans’ task was to halt or at least slow down the Union flanking movement until more southern forces could be shuffled into action against them.

As the first Union infantry began marching towards the slopes of Matthews Hill, Evans ordered a brazen counterattack. The honor of this day’s first ‘hot action’ fell to Major Roberdeau Wheat’s 1st Louisiana Battalion, known as ‘Wheat’s Tigers.’ Wheat anchored his left flank on Matthews Hill, and his men launched multiple attacks against the approaching Federals. A few days after the battle, a wounded Wheat remembered the morning’s events:
Having reached [the right of the line of battle on Matthews Hill], I moved by the left flank to an open field, a wood being on my left. From this cover, to my utter surprise, I received a volley of musketry which unfortunately came from our own troops, mistaking us for the enemy, killing three and wounding several of my men. Apprehending instantly the real cause of the accident, I called out to my own men not to return the fire. Those near enough to hear, obeyed; the more distant, did not. Almost at the same moment, the enemy in front opened upon us with musketry, grape, canister, round shot and shells. I immediately charged upon the enemy and drove him from his position. As he rallied again in a few minutes, I charged him a second and a third time successfully.’ 

Such episodes of friendly fire were common this early in the war, for several reasons. First, most soldiers were inexperienced, and in the ‘fog of war’ an amateur could easily fire into his fellow soldiers. Second, uniforms had not been standardized; accurate depictions of the battle will show a variety of uniforms for both North and South. Third, both armies carried similar-looking flags: the Federals carried the United States’ ‘stars and stripes’ flag, and the Confederates carried their ‘Stars and Bars,’ eleven stars on a blue field set in the corner of a flag with two red and one white horizontal bars. In the fog of war, these bars could be mistaken one for the other. Beauregard noticed this, and it led him to design a new battle flag with white stars embedded in a blue St. Andres’ Cross on a red field. [See the image to the right: from top to bottom we have the 1861 'Stars and Stripes' for the Union, the 1861 'Stars and Bars' for the Confederacy, and the upcoming Confederate 'Battle Flags' with St. Andrews' Cross.]

Charles Coffin had relocated from the Stone Bridge and joined the flanking columns at nearby Sudley Springs. He reported, as if watching it in real-time, ‘The Union troops at Sudley Springs move across the stream. Burnside’s brigade is in advance. The Second Rhode Island infantry is thrown out, deployed as skirmishers. The men are five paces apart. They move slowly, cautiously, and nervously through the fields and thickets. Suddenly, from bushes, trees, and fences there is a rattle of musketry… Evans’s skirmishers are firing. There are jets of flame and smoke, and a strange humming in the air. There is another rattle, a roll, a volley. The cannon join.’ Nurse Edmunds recounted, ‘Now the battle began to rage with terrible fury. Nothing could be heard save the thunder of artillery [and] the continuous roar of musketry. Oh, what a scene for the bright sun of a holy Sabbath morning to shine upon!’ Evans continued:
Advancing from the wood with a portion of my command, I reached some haystacks under cover of which I was enabled to damage the enemy very much… I was put [out of] combat by a Minie ball passing through my body and inflicting what was at first thought to be a mortal wound… Being left without a field officer, the companies rallied under their respective captains and, as you are aware, bore themselves gallantly throughout the day in the face of an enemy far outnumbering us.’ 

Reinforcements under Brigadier General Bernard Bee and Colonel Francis S. Bartow arrived at Matthews Hill shortly after Evans was wounded, bringing the paper total of southern forces to 2800 men against the Federal flanking columns. Evans’ fierce Tigers were thankful for the support. Confederate artillery unlimbered and began to ply their trade into the advancing Federals. Union Colonel Henry Slocum, spying the enemy artillery, rallied his men: ‘Come on, boys! Let us silence that battery – come strike for your country and for your God!’ His New Yorkers surged upslope towards the Confederate guns. Private William Westervelt described the moment: ‘Here I saw the first man killed, who was marching just in front of me was struck with grape shot over the left eye. He gave an unearthly screech and leaping into the air, came down on his hands and knees, and straightened out dead.’ For nearly two hours, the Confederates on Matthews Hill blunted the Federal advance. Hunter’s lead Union brigade, led by General Ambrose Burnside, suffered mightily. Regiments from New York, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire slugged it out with regiments from South Carolina, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi. Heintzelman was later noted by Confederates as ‘a gray-haired man, sitting sideways on horseback’ who displayed ‘coolness and gallantry’ as he ‘directed the movements of each [Union] regiment as it came up the hill.’ This was in stark contrast to other parts of the battlefield, where inexperienced Union officers didn’t coordinate their assaults but sent them in piecemeal. One Union soldier frightfully remembered how, on the slopes of the hill, he was ‘in the very presence of death.’ Charles Coffin gaped at the scene, and he later wrote (again as if witnessing it in real time):  ‘Men fall. They are bleeding, torn, and mangled. The trees are splintered, crushed, and broken, as if smitten by thunderbolts. Twigs and leaves fall to the ground. There is smoke, dust, wild talking, shouting; hissings, howlings, explosions. It is a new, strange, unanticipated experience to the soldiers of both armies, far different from what they thought it would be.’ 

On a nearby hill between the Cub Run bridge and Centreville, journalists, reporters, well-to-do aristocratic statesmen, and curious civilians gathered to watch the fury on Matthews Hill from a safe distance. Howard Russell, a correspondent for the London Times (later dubbed ‘Bull Run Russell’) captured the scene: 
[The] sounds which came upon the breeze and the sights which met our eyes were in terrible variance with the tranquil character of the landscape. The woods far and near echoed to the roar of cannon; and thin, frayed lines of blue smoke marked the spots whence came the muttering sound of rolling musketry… Clouds of dust shifted and moved through the forest, and I could see the gleam of arms and the twinkling of bayonets. On the hill beside me there was a crowd of civilians on horseback and in all sorts of vehicles, with a few of the fairer, if not gentler, sex… The spectators were all excited, and a lady with an opera glass who was near me was quite beside herself when an unusually heavy discharge roused the current of her blood: “This is splendid! Oh, my! Is not that first-rate? I guess we will be in Richmond this time tomorrow.”

At  10A, as Wheat’s Tigers were entrenching on Matthews Hill and getting ready to blunt the Federal advance, one of Tyler’s brigade commanders at the Stone Bridge, a relatively unknown colonel by the name of William Tecumseh Sherman, pushed his men across Bull Run at the Poplar (or Farm) Ford to approach the enemy on Matthews Hill from behind. Sherman’s audacious surprise attack, coupled with the pressure of the Union weight of numbers advancing from Sudley Springs, buckled the Confederate line. With Federals to the front and rapidly approaching the rear, the Confederates had no viable option but to withdraw to a second line of defense. A battery of four six-pounder cannon covered Evans’, Bee’s, and Bartow’s retreat south from Matthews Hill. James Tinham of Massachusetts remembered the moment: ‘We fired a volley, and saw the Rebels running. Then we were ordered to lie down and load. We aimed at the puffs of smoke we saw rising in front and on the left of us. The men were all a good deal excited. Our rear rank had singed the hair of the front rank, who were more afraid of them than of the Rebels. The next thing I remember was the order to advance, which we did under a scattering fire.’ 

As they retreated, New York regiments continued the chase and engaged the retreating southerners in brief hand-to-hand combat at the ‘Stone House’ just south of the hill and lying on Young’s Branch, a little tributary of Bull Run. At the same time, Confederates under Wade Hampton’s ‘Hampton Legion’ and General Thomas Jackson’s Virginians engaged the Federals around the buildings of the James Robinson farmstead; while the Federals under General Erasmus Keyes pushed the Confederates up the slopes of a larger hill known as Henry Hill, they did not press their advantage and allowed the Confederates to retreat to a cluster of buildings atop the hill. New York Lieutenant William Thompson Lusk, who belonged to a New York regiment under Sherman, was elated at the enemy retreat but overawed at the death and destruction around Matthews Hill and the Stone House: 
From many a point not long since covered by secession forces, the American banner now floated. What wonder we felt our hearts swelling with pride, and saw, hardly noticing, horse and rider lying stiff, cold, and bloody together! What, though we stepped unthinking over the pale body of many a brave fellow still grasping convulsively his gun, with the shadows of Death closing around him! We were following the foe and dreaming only of victory.


The Struggle for Henry Hill
The Federals who had tangled with the retreating Confederates at the Stone House didn’t pursue them across Young’s Branch. The exhausted southerners ascended the slopes of Henry Hill to find a piece of rest before the battle continued. Both sides were determining what to do next, and as councils of war took place, the wounded were carried back to their respective rears. J.C. Nott, a Confederate doctor, remembered: ‘My heart failed me as I saw load after load of our poor wounded and dying soldiers brought and strewed on the ground along the ravine where I was at work. Dr. Fanthray, who belonged to General Johnston’s staff, and myself were just getting fully to work when an old surgeon, whom I do not know, came to us and ordered us to fall back to another point with the wounded, as the battle would soon be upon us.’ Union observer Edwin S. Barret noted that there was  ‘a continuous stream of wounded [being] carried past me to the rear. The soldiers would cross their muskets, place their wounded companions across, and slowly carry them past; another soldier would have a wounded man with his arm around his neck, slowly walking back; and then two men would be bearing a mortally wounded comrade in their arms, who was in convulsions and writing in his last agonies.’

Evans, Bee, and Bartow met with both Beauregard and Johnston atop Henry House Hill. Here were two old houses, one owned by a free black named James Robinson and the other by Mrs. Judith Henry (pictured here to the right). The Confederates stationed themselves at the ‘Henry House,’ for the Robinson homestead lie too close to the Federals at Bull Run. While the Union infantry took a breather at the bottom of Henry Hill, Union artillery began entrenching themselves on Dogan Hill to the northwest; here they would be able to fire into the Confederate masses. Brigadier Thomas Jackson, having extricated himself from Keyes at the Robinson House, joined the Confederate leadership gaggle along with Colonel J.E.B. Stuart and Wade Hampton’s ‘Hampton Legion’[2]. Meanwhile, Union batteries under commanders Ricketts and Griffin were ordered to support positions that exposed them to enemy fire. Coffin remembered that ‘[Captain] Ricketts does not like the order, but he is a soldier in the regular army and believes in obeying commands. The battery ascends the hill towards the Henry house and opens fire at close range. Griffin comes, with his horses upon the gallop [and] takes position to the left of Ricketts.’

As the Union batteries began moving into position, Sherman’s brigade began pushing against Henry Hill. Hampton’s Legion rushed forward to stunt his advance. Sherman’s 79th New York was decimated by the southern musketry and began to fall apart (it’s known that Hampton had purchased 400 Pattern 1853 Enfield rifles, but it’s unknown if his men had them for this battle; if they did, it would explain the decimation of the New Yorkers). At one point Wade Hampton gestured towards his enemy combatant James Cameron, Colonel of the 79th New York, and told his men, ‘Look at that brave officer trying to lead his men, and they won’t follow him.’ Cameron was the brother of Simon Cameron, the U.S. Secretary of War. Cameron suffered a fatal wound shortly after Hampton’s remark,  and it’s rumored that Hampton deliberately targeted officers of the 79th to avenge the death of his nephew earlier that day at the hands of New Yorkers (those offenders, however, belonged to the 69th New York, not the 79th). William Thompson Lusk of the 79th New York wrote to his mother of the approach to Henry House Hill:
What wonder we felt our hearts swelling with pride, and saw, hardly noticing, horse and rider lying stiff, cold and bloody together! What, though we stepped unthinking over the pale body of many a brave fellow still grasping convulsively his gun, with the shadows of Death closing around him! We were following the foe, I have said, and were dreaming only of victory. So we were marched to the edge of a slope which sheltered us partially from the aim of the enemy’s artillery. Here lying prostrate, shell after shell flew over our heads, or tore up the ground around. Now we could feel the hot breath of a cannon ball fan our cheeks; now we could see one fairly aimed, falling among our horses, and rolling them prostrate; and now again one of these messengers would come swift into the ranks of one of our columns, and without a thought or a groan, a soul was hurried into eternity.

As Hampton and Sherman were trading blows, Jackson placed his artillery just 300 yards from those of Ricketts and Griffin, and they immediately turned their fire on the limbered Union cannons that were moving to their new positions. Southern Captain John D. Imboden was ordered by Jackson to ride ‘from battery to battery’ to ensure that the guns were properly aimed and the fuses cut to the right length. He recounts:
This was the work of but a few minutes. On returning to the left of the line of guns, I stopped to ask General Jackson’s permission to rejoin my battery. [Jackson was astride his horse.] The fight was just then hot enough to make him feel well. His eyes fairly blazed. He had a way of throwing up his left hand with the open palm toward the person he was addressing. And as he told me to go, he made this gesture. The air was full of flying missiles, and he jerked down his hand, and I saw that blood was streaming from it. I exclaimed, “General, you are wounded!” He replied, as he drew a handkerchief from his breastpocket and began to bind it up, “Only a scratch – a mere scratch,” and galloped away along his line.’ 

Jackson later wrote: ‘Although under a heavy fire for several continuous hours, I received only one wound, the breaking of the longest finger of my left hand. My horse was wounded, but not killed.’ He ordered his men to dig in on the reverse slope of Henry Hill, where they were protected from direct fire. He placed thirteen cannon on the crest of the hill, and as the guns fired, their recoil pushed them downslope where they could be safely reloaded and pushed back into place. McDowell ordered his artillery on Dogan Hill to move to Matthews Hill. Soon enough eleven Union guns were dueling with Jackson’s thirteen. The smoothbore Confederate cannons had an advantage against the rifled Union cannons at such short range, as many Union rounds went well over the heads of their targets. Imboden recounted the duel:
More than half our horses had been killed. Those that we had were quickly divided among the guns and caissons, and we limbered up and fled. Then it was that the Henry House was riddled [for] our line of retreat was chosen so that the house would conceal us from Griffin’s battery, and, in a measure, shelter us from the dreaded fire of the infantry when they should reach the crest we had just abandoned. Several of Griffin’s shot passed through the house, scattering shingles, boards, and splinters all around us.

the Federal advance on Henry House Hill


The Union infantry advanced beneath the storm of crisscrossing cannonballs overhead, and the cordon began to tighten around the Henry Hill House. New Yorkers, Minnesotans, and the U.S. Marine Corps Battalion stormed uphill towards Jackson’s Virginians. His stalwart Virginians entrenched themselves and prepared to trade volleys. The weight of the Federals began to show, and Brigadier General Bee exclaimed to Jackson, ‘The enemy are driving us!’ Jackson coolly reported, ‘Then, sir, we will give the bayonet.’ According to legend, Bee exhorted his own troops to look to Jackson: ‘There is Jackson standing like a stone wall! Let us determine to die here, and we will conquer! Rally behind the Virginians!’ Bee’s exclamation is believed to be the source for Jackson’s (and his brigade’s) nickname: ‘Stonewall Jackson and his Stonewall Brigade.’ However, some are doubtful, and Bee never got a chance to clarify his intentions: shortly after rallying the troops, he was gut-shot and succumbed to his wounds the next day. It’s interesting that none of Bee’s contemporaries mentioned the exchange, and Major Burnett Rhett, Johnston’s Chief of Staff, alleged that Bee was furious with Jackson for failing to come to him, Evans’, and Bartow’s relief when they were retreating from Matthews Hill (Bartow died that afternoon from wounds sustained in battle). Per Rhett, one could argue – and many historians have! – that Bee’s exclamation was not one of star-struck awe but of sarcastic mockery: while he should’ve been moving to aid his fellow countrymen, here he was just standing still as stone! Whichever interpretation one takes, this reality is undeniable: Jackson’s brigade suffered more casualties than any other southern brigade this day. 

Thomas Jackson leading his Virginians


As the Federals tightened the noose around the hill, the fighting became vicious and close-quarter. Charles Coffin recounts: ‘There is not much order. Regiments are scattered. The lines are not even. There are a great many stragglers on both sides… The artillery crashes louder than before. There is a continuous rattle of musketry. There are desperate hand-to-hand encounters. Hundreds fall, and other hundreds leave the ranks.’ The Union observer Edwin S. Barrett, sitting among the upper branches of a persimmon tree, had an eagle’s-eye view of the battlefield as the Union lines closed with those of the Confederacy:
I had an unobstructed view of the whole line, and I could see into the enemy’s intrenchments, where the men looked like so many bees in a hive; and I could plainly see their officers riding about, and their different columns moving hither and thither. Their batteries on the right and left were masked with trees so completely that I could not distinguish them except by the flash from their guns. The valley in front of the enemy’s works was filled with our infantry, extending to some patches of woods on our right. Our batteries were placed on various eminences on the flank and rear, shifting their positions from time to time. The fire from our lines in this valley was terrific, and as they kept slowly advancing, firing, retreating to load, and then advancing again, it was a sight which no words could describe.

Union Captain Griffin moved two of his guns to the southern end of the Federal line with the hope of providing enfilading fire against the enemy. At around 3P, Jackson’s 33rd Virginian advanced on the guns. Jackson’s men wore blue uniforms, which were common with the Federals, so that Griffin’s commander believed them to be Union troops and ordered Griffin not to fire on them. Thus the guns remained silent as the Federals approached. The cannoneers suffered momentary confusion as they watched the approaching blue-coated soldiers form into a battle line. A member of Griffin’s battery captures the moment the confusion passed: ‘[There] came a tremendous explosion of musketry, and all was confusion. Wounded men were clinging to caissons, to which were attached frightened and wounded horses. I saw three horses galloping off, dragging a fourth, which was dead. The dead cannoneers lay with the rammers, sponges, and lanyards still in their hands. The battery was annihilated by those volleys in a moment.’ Many of the New York ‘Fire Zouaves’ supporting Griffin’s battery were slain along with several gunners. The stunned Federals were preparing to counterstrike when J.E.B. Stuart’s saber-wielding cavalry arrived onto the scene and pushed themselves into the battery, slashing and cutting and generally sowing chaos. William Lusk of the 79th New York remembered the scene:
After about an hour in this trying position, we were called up and turned into the road, where Death began to make sad havoc in our ranks. Surely aimed, the shot of the enemy fell among us. We could not see the foe, and then it was terrible to see our own boys, whose faces we knew, and whose hands we had pressed, falling in Death agony. We heard, while marching stealthily, a great shout, and looking we saw a hill before us, covered with the Ellsworth Zouaves. A moment more, and from the top of the hill, from unseen hands blazed a terrible discharge of arms. It was one of those masked batteries, which have so often brought us misfortune. Bravely fought the Zouaves, but they had to fall back from that hellish fire. Other Regiments made the charge but only to be repulsed with ranks thinned and broken. At length our turn came. Up we rushed—our brave Colonel with us. The first fire swept our ranks like a quick darting pestilence. “Rally, boys—Rally!” shouted the officers, and a brave rally was made. Our men stood firmly firing, answering volley by volley. Here we felt the worthlessness of our old Harper’s Ferry muskets, when matched against the rifles of the enemy.

Jackson’s men captured Griffin’s guns, but a Federal counterattack pushed them back. The Federals recaptured their guns, much to the dismay of the Confederates. Beauregard, fearing that their demoralization would sap their strength and resolve, ‘rode up and down [the] lines, between the enemy and his own men, regardless of the heavy fire, cheering and encouraging [the] troops’ (per the Richmond Dispatch). Beauregard launched a counter-attack with Jackson’s brigade in the center. They recaptured the guns, and Beauregard remembered how ‘Jackson’s brigade pierced the enemy’s center with the determination of veterans and the spirit of men who fight for a sacred cause; but it suffered seriously. With equal spirit the other parts of the line made the onset, and the Federal lines were broken and swept back at all points from the open ground of the plateau. Rallying soon, however, the Federalists returned, and by weight of numbers pressed our lines back, recovered their ground and guns, and renewed the offensive.’ Beauregard then ‘ordered forward the whole line, which, at this crisis of the battle, I felt called upon to lead in person. The whole open ground was again swept clear of the enemy, and the plateau around the Henry and Robinson houses remained finally in our possession, with the greater part of the Ricketts and Griffin batteries and a flag of the 1st Michigan regiment, captured by Jackson’s brigade.’ 

This penultimate fighting on Henry House Hill was brutal and often hand-to-hand. It was during this struggle that Jackson told soldiers of the 4th Virginia Infantry, ‘Reserve your fire until they come within fifty yards! Then fire and give them the bayonet! And when you charge, yell like furies!’ This is one of the first times that Union troops heard the disturbing ‘Rebel Yell,’ here described by a northern soldier: ‘There is nothing like [the rebel yell] on this side of the infernal region. The peculiar corkscrew sensation that it sends down your backbone under these circumstances can never be told. You have to feel it.’ A Virginian noted of this fighting around the Henry House that ‘The shouts of the combatants, the groans of the wounded and dying and the explosion of shells made a complete pandemonium…the atmosphere was black with the smoke of the battle.’ A Wisconsin soldier told of how the bodies were stacked in a roadway ditch: ‘The poor fellows had crowded in and crawled one upon another, filling the ditch in some places three or four deep…I will not sicken you with a description of the road.’ William Lusk captured the moment the Federals broke under the weight of the Confederates:
Tall men were mowed down about me. Wounded men begged their comrades to press on, and not to risk anything by lingering near them. We were only some twenty yards from a battery, belching forth a thick heavy hail of grape and canister, shell and fire of musketry. With unerring accuracy the enemy’s riflemen singled out our officers and mighty men. Suddenly we saw the American flag waving over the battery. “Cease firing” was the order given, and for a short moment we believed the battery was ours. It was the enemy though that had raised the flag to deceive us. As we lowered our arms, and were about to rally where the banner floated, we were met by a terrible raking fire, against which we could only stagger. “By the Lord, but I believe them coons’s too cunning for us!” cried an old soldier near me. We halted, fell bac k, and the hillside was left to such only as lingered to bear away their wounded comrades. As we passed down we saw our Colonel lying still, in the hands of Death. He had fallen bravely, breast to the foe, not wishing to cherish his own life, while the lives of his men were imperiled. Over the sad disheartening retreat let us not linger—let it be covered by the darkness of the night which followed.

The Union Retreat
The seesaw fighting on Henry Hill ended with the Confederates retaining hold of the hill as the Federals retreated downslope towards Young’s Branch. To the southwest of Henry Hill, Union Colonel Oliver O. Howard hoped to gain a toehold on a prominence known as Chinn Ridge. McDowell hoped this toehold could be a launching point to push forces around the Confederate left flank. However, Howard was opposed by two just-arriving brigades from the Shenandoah, one led by Colonel Jubal Early and the other by Brigadier General Kirby Smith. These forces were well-rested and itching for a fight, and as they charged Howard on Chinn Ridge, Howard realized his winded and beleaguered troops wouldn’t be able to stand against them. Beauregard, seeing the Federals falling back from Chinn Ridge and Henry Hill, ordered the entire Confederate line forward. As the southerners gave a rebel yell and surged downslope after the retreating enemy, the Federals – exhausted from marching or fighting for fourteen hours, hungry and thirsty on a brutally hot and humid July day, and many whose three-month enlistments were about to expire – completely broke. In large and small groups, and as individuals, unit integrity disintegrated as they began fleeing east towards the Union camp at Centreville. 

McDowell rode around the field and tried to rally the soldiers, but most had had enough. McDowell could read the writing on the wall: the day was over, and the Union had lost. Hoping to salvage something from the debacle, he ordered Colonel Andrew Porter’s regular U.S. Infantry (not militia or volunteers) to hold the intersection at the Warrenton Turnpike and the Manassas-Sudley Road as a rearguard. Porter remembered how ‘the slopes were swarming with our retreating and disorganized forces, while riderless horses and artillery teams ran furiously through the flying crowd. All further efforts were futile. The words, gestures, and threats of our officers were thrown away upon men who had lost all presence of mind, and only longed for absence of body.’ Another body of men under Union Major George Sikes positioned themselves at a critical ridge close to the Stone Bridge. His battalion formed a square and defended the ridge against Confederate infantry and cavalry until all the fleeing Federals had crossed the bridge. Sykes’ battalion then crossed the bridge in good order. Days later, when President Lincoln reviewed the Federal troops at D.C., an army commander pointed out the battalion and said to Lincoln, ‘These are the men who saved your army.’ Lincoln coolly replied, ‘Yes, I have heard of them.’

The holding actions of both Porter and Sykes are the gems of the Union retreat; whereas their actions prompted honor and gratitude, the rest of the army was an embarrassment – and there was no hiding it. First Bull Run has also been called the ‘Picnic Battle’ because the wealthy elite of D.C., including statesmen and their families (among them children), had come to picnic and watch the battle from a distance. They anticipated an easy victory, and they intended to celebrate with picnic baskets and opera glasses. Captain John Tidball wrote:
They came in all manner of ways, some in stylish carriages, others in city hacks, and still others in buggies, on horseback and even on foot. Apparently, everything in the shape of vehicles in and around Washington had been pressed into service for the occasion. It was Sunday and everybody seemed to have taken a general holiday; that is all the male population, for I saw none of the other sex there, except a few huckster women who had driven out in carts loaded with pies and other edibles. All manner of people were represented in this crowd, from the gravest and noble senators to hotel waiters.



When the Federals were forced to retreat, the roads became blocked by panicked civilians attempting to flee in their gilded carriages. One congressman noted that ‘the further [the Union soldiers ran], the more frightened they grew.’ A correspondent for the New York Tribune wrote, ‘All sense of manhood seemed to be forgotten. Even the sentiment of shame had gone. Every impediment to flight was cast aside. Rifles, bayonets, pistols, haversacks, cartridge-boxes, canteens, blankets, belts, and overcoats littered the road.’ One bridge was made impassable by overturned wagons; Colonel Burnside recounted, ‘Upon the bridge crossing Cub Run a shot took effect upon the horses of a team that was crossing. The wagon was overturned directly in the center of the bridge, and the passage was completely obstructed. The enemy continued to play his artillery upon the carriages, ambulances, and artillery wagons that filled the road, and these were reduced to ruin. The infantry, as the files reached the bridge, were furiously pelted with a shower of grape and other shot, and several persons were here killed or dangerously wounded.’ Edmund Stedman of the New York World wrote, ‘Horses, many of them in death agony [from battlefield wounds], galloped at random forward. Those on foot who could catch them rode them bareback, as much to save themselves from being run over as to make quicker time. Wounded men lying along the banks appealed with raised hands to those who rode horses, but few regarded such petitions.’ A Confederate shell destroyed Senator Henry Wilson’s buggy, and he had to mount a mule to escape. Iowa Senator James Grimes was nearly captured and vowed never to go near a battlefield again; New York representative Alfred Ely was not so fortunate: he was captured as a prisoner of war and sent to Richmond.Michigan senator Zachariah Chandler tried to stem the Union retreat by blocking the road, but he was bodily shoved out of the way. Senator Ben Wade of Ohio picked up a discarded rifle and threatened to shoot any soldier who ran. He remembered:
We called to them, tried to tell them there was no danger, called them to stop, implored them to stand. We called them cowards, denounced them in the most offensive terms, put out our heavy revolvers, and threatened to shoot them, but all in van; a cruel, crazy, mad, hopeless panic possessed them, and communicated to everybody about in front and rear. The heat was awful, although now about six; the men were exhausted – their mouths gaped, their lips cracked and blackened with the powder of the cartridges they had bitten off in battle, their eyes starting in frenzy; no mortal ever saw such a mass of ghastly wretches.

The pell-mell retreat became known as ‘The Great Skedaddle’ in the southern press. Confederate President Jefferson Davis arrived at the battlefield just as the Federals were fleeing east. He had chartered a special train, obtained a horse near Manassas, and rode with an aide that afternoon towards the battle. Pushing through a flood of wounded southerners, he was exhorted to go back; ‘We’re whipped!’ he was told. Davis pushed on, knowing that the rear of a battlefield – with its stragglers, its cowards, its dead and its maimed – was the same for both victors and losers. Once Davis found Johnston, Johnston was elated with news of the triumph. Davis urged him to send his men after the fleeing northerners, but Johnston didn’t think his men had it in him; he later justified this, saying, ‘Our army was more disorganized by victory than that of the United States by defeat.’ In D.C., Lincoln and his cabinet received a telegram stating ‘General McDowell’s army in full retreat through Centreville. The day is lost. Save Washington and the remnants of the army.’ Happier tidings reached Richmond; Davis telegraphed, ‘We have won a glorious but dear-bought victory. Night closed on the enemy in full flight and closely pursued.’ This last bit was propaganda, as the Confederates did not chase their enemy out of Virginia. [3 and 4]


Postscript
By midnight in D.C., officers and civilians who had been fortunate enough to find horses began arriving in the city. Presidential Secretary John Nicolay recounted: ‘It was a gloomy night, but yet gloomier days followed. Next day, Monday, the rain commenced falling… Through this rain the disbanded soldiers began to pour into Washington City, fagged out, hungry, and dejected, and having literally nowhere to turn their feet or lay their head.’ He added: ‘History owes a page of honorable mention to the Federal capital on this occasion. The rich and poor, the high and low of her loyal people, opened their doors and dealt out food and refreshments to the footsore, haggard, and half-starved men so unexpectedly reduced to tramps and fugitives.’ The same day that the Federals were routed from the battlefield, the U.S. House of Representatives, in a special session, unanimously passed the following resolution:
Resolved, That the maintenance of the Constitution, the preservation of the Union, and the enforcement of the laws, are sacred trusts which must be executed; that no disaster shall discourage us from the most ample performance of this high duty; and that we pledge to the country and the world the employment of every resource, national and individual, for the suppression, overthrow, and punishment of rebels in arms.

Despite the bombastic pledge to overthrow ‘rebels in arms,’ panic gripped the capital. 14,000 Confederate forces were just thirty miles away, and little stood to oppose them. On 24 July Professor Thaddeus S.C. Lowe took up his hot air balloon Enterprise to see what the Confederates were up to. The Enterprise was built with Indian silk, lightweight cording, and Lowe’s patent varnish (a secret recipe) which could keep the balloon envelope gassed up for as long as two weeks. In his first flight, as he tried to land in the Union encampment, he was rebuffed by Union soldiers (he didn’t have any military insignia on the balloon, and they didn’t know if he was friend or foe); Lowe was forced to land his balloon behind enemy lines. Fortunately, he was rescued overnight before the enemy could find him. The Enterprise was badly damaged, but his exploits were impressive enough that he was given the green light to build a proper balloon. The Union was delighted to hear that it did not appear as if the Confederates were planning an attack. 

The battle at Bull Run convinced both sides that the war would be longer and costlier than originally thought. On 22 July, the day after the battle, Lincoln signed a bill that funded the enlistment of another 500,000 men for up to three years of service; three days later 11,000 Pennsylvanians who had been rejected for federal service were gladly accepted. The U.S. Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War was a congressional body created to investigate northern military affairs, and it was created in the wake of the battle. Though the Committee concluded that the Union defeat was best attributed to Patterson failing to keep Johnston bottled up in Winchester, Patterson’s enlistment had expired, and there was nothing that could be done to him. The people needed a scapegoat, and McDowell was it: he was relieved of his command three days after the battle, on 25 July, and replaced by George B. McClellan, who would soon be named General-in-Chief of all Union armies. The demoted McDowell remained in the army, and in an unfortunate twist of irony, he would bear significant blame for the Union defeat by General Robert E. Lee at the Second Battle of Manassas on 28-30 August 1862. McDowell has gotten a bad rap for his defeat, but at the end of the day, his plan was a good one, and the actions he took during the battle were wise; his defeat had more to do with ill-trained and undisciplined troops coupled with bad luck. 



[1] The Wilmer McLean house sat on Wilmer McLean’s farm near Manassas, Virginia. Following the battle he would relocate to the southwest at Appomatox. In a fun twist of fate, the first major land engagement of the Civil War began with cannon-balls through his first home, and in 1865 the war ended when Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered to Union General U.S. Grant in the parlor of his second home. The war ‘started and ended’ on his threshold. 

[2] The Hampton Legion was a brigade of infantry, cavalry, and artillery organized and partially financed by the wealthy South Carolina planter Wade Hampton III. 

[3] The Union forces were commanded by Irvin McDowell, and the forces consisted of the U.S. Army of Northern Virginia and U.S.  Marines. McDowell’s forces numbered 35,700 on paper, but only 18,000 were engaged. His army was organized into five infantry divisions of 3-5 brigades each; each brigade consisted of 3-5 infantry regiments, and each brigade was generally assigned an artillery battle. The Federals suffered 2708 casualties: 481 killed, 1011 wounded, and 1216 missing. 

[4] The Confederate forces were commanded by Joseph E. Johnston and P.G.T. Beauregard. Johnston commanded the Army of the Shenandoah, and Beauregard commanded the Army of the Potomac; between the two, Johnston was the superior officer. The Confederate forces numbered between 32,000 and 34,000 on paper, but only 18,000 were engaged. Johnston’s Army of the Shenandoah was organized into four brigades, and each brigade consisted of 3-5 regiments and an artillery battery. J.E.B. Stuart’s cavalry numbered 300 men and had twenty pieces of artillery. Beauregard’s Army of the Potomac was organized into seven infantry brigade, and each brigade consisted of 3-6 infantry regiments. Artillery batteries were attached to select brigades. The Confederates suffered far fewer casualties than the attacking Federals: total casualties amount to 1982, with 387 killed, 1582 wounded, and 13 missing. 

Alcibiades: A Life

Alcibiades was born in the ancient Greek city of Athens around 450 BC. Athens was just one of nearly a thousand Greek city-states. We call ...