Thursday, April 27, 2017

Before the Vikings: The Rise & Fall of Kingdoms

The Political Landscape of the Early 7th Century – The Unification of Northumbria – Gregory and the Angels – The Splintering of Wales – Northumbrian Rivalries –Penda and Oswald – The Synod of Whitby – Wulfhere and Ecgfrith – Baeda and Alcuin – The Emergence of Wessex – Aethelbald and Eadbert – The Reign of Offa of Mercia – King Ecgberht and the Rise of Wessex – A Unified England

In the early 7th century Anglo-Saxon Britain was divided into several large kingdoms: Kent, Sussex (the South Saxons), Essex (the East Saxons), Wessex (the West Saxons), East Anglia, Mercia (the “Men of the March”), and Northumbria (composed of Bernicia and Deira). The Venerable Bede tells us that by his time four kings from various kingdoms had gathered lordship over many if not all of the Anglo-Saxon peoples. The first four Bretwaldas (“Kings of Britain”) were Aelle of Sussex, Caewlin of the Gewisse, Aethelbert of Kent, and Raedwald of East Anglia. The last two were Northumbrian rulers: Eadwine and Oswald. The first half of Anglo-Saxon history is marked by the rise and fall of various kingdoms. Northumbria in the north was the first to rise to prominence, followed swiftly by the middle kingdom of Mercia. These two kingdoms were constantly at variance, and their fortunes waxed and waned over the centuries. In the early 8th century a new powerhouse, that of Wessex, joined the squabbling Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. Northumbria, the first to rise, would also be the first to fall; Mercia’s greatness would come to heel under the weight of Wessex; and the West Saxons would then be left alone to slug it out with the third invader of Britain: the Northmen.

Our story begins with the unification of Northumbria. In AD 547 Ida the Flame-Bearer founded the town of Bebbanburg. Ida was the king of Bernicia, the northernmost Anglo-Saxon kingdom. His fourth son, Aethelric, expanded Bernicia’s borders over the Britons to the west. Having conquered the Britons, Aethelric looked across his southern border to the Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Deira. Deira’s king, Aella, was dying, and Aethelric took advantage of his weakness and launched an invasion of his kingdom. Aella died in 588, and Aethelric conquered his kingdom. Deira was absorbed into Bernicia, and Northumbria was united for the first time—but the two houses of Bernicia and Deira would be ever at odds with one another, repeatedly tearing asunder Northumbria’s political and social fabric.

Aethelric’s conquest of Deira produced a host of Deiran slaves, and slave traders bought the slaves off Bernicia’s merchants and shipped them for sale to Rome. Legend has it that a group of these slaves was displayed for sale in the Forum of Trajan, and a deacon named Gregory walked by and noticed their white bodies, fair faces, and golden hair. “From what country do these slaves come?” Gregory asked the slave trader. The merchant told him that they were Angles. “Not Angles,” Gregory mused, “but Angels, with faces so angel-like!” Gregory was driven to evangelize the pagan Germanic Anglo-Saxons, initiating the transformation of Anglo-Saxon England from paganism to Christianity.

In the height of the Roman Empire, Christianity flourished from Italy to Ireland, but Roman Christianity had all but fizzled out under the onslaught of the Anglo-Saxon invasion. The Anglo-Saxons were Germanic, and they worshipped their own pagan gods. Odin, the war-god, was their chief deity; he was known as the guardian of ways and boundaries, was the inventor of letters, and the first ancestor of tribal kings. They worshipped many other gods, and their names are with us today in the English days of the week: Wednesday is Odin’s Day, Thursday is Thor’s Day, and Friday is Frigg’s Day. They also worshipped deities of the wood and fell and the hero-gods of legend and song. They brought their religion to Britain, and thus they put a wedge between Christian Ireland to the west and Christian Gaul, Spain, and Italy to the east. Gregory’s missionary activities reintroduced Christianity into eastern Britain. At first the Roman Catholic missionaries attached themselves to kings as royal chaplains, and as the king’s chaplain’s became bishops and the kingdoms their dioceses, the chaplains of nobles became priests and the nobles’ manors their parishes. One-by-one the pagan Anglo-Saxon kingdoms became Christian, starting with the rulers and filtering down to the people, but while the social changes wrought by the conversion of Britain were remarkable, they weren’t immediate. The conversion of England was gradual, and it happened amid the rising, falling, and striving of kingdoms.

Anglo-Saxon Warriors
In 613 the Bernician ruler of Northumbria, Aethelfrith, continued his predecessors’ westward expansion. Northumbria had yet to become Christian, and when his forces met those of the British he was bewildered by the hundreds of Celtic priests praying and chanting behind the British ranks. He ordered his men to kill every priest, and they did just that at the ensuing Battle of Chester. After his victory northern Wales disintegrated into squabbling British kingdoms. Far to the south the West Saxons beat the British at Deorham, driving a wedge of Anglo-Saxon territory between northern and southern Wales (thus henceforth known as North and South Wales). Aethelfrith’s westward expansion didn’t placate the nobles of Deira, and in 617 Eadwine of Deira conquered Bernicia in an about-face. Eadwine ushered in an era of peace for Northumbria, and he built a city in the north and named it after himself (modern Edinburgh). Eadwine gained lordship over Mercia and ruled all of the Anglo-Saxons except for Wessex. A West Saxon envoy tried to assassinate him at an Easter court, but Eadwine survived. He marched on the West Saxons, delivered a vicious and vengeful blow, and then returned back to Northumbria. Eadwine converted to Christianity, and after his death the House of Bernicia reclaimed the Northumbrian throne. The houses of Bernicia and Deira would quarrel down through the centuries, undermining Northumbria’s political stability.

Eadwine’s conversion to Christianity wasn’t widely embraced, and King Penda of Mercia, hoping to check Northumbrian expansionism westward, used religious discontent to fire his people to war. Penda was hailed as the “Champion of the Heathen Gods,” and in 632 he forged an ironic alliance was Cadwallon, the Christian king of Gwynedd (a British rather than Anglo-Saxon kingdom), and marched on Northumbria (now ruled by King Oswald of the Bernician line). He and Cadwallon defeated the Northumbrians at the Battle of Heathfield in 633. King Oswald recovered power shortly thereafter and launched a counter-attack against Cadwallon and slayed him on the field in 635. Restless Deirans submitted to him, solidifying his tremulous hold on Northumbria. Oswald embraced the Christian faith and called for missionaries from Iona, in Scotland, to evangelize the heathens of Britain. Missionaries established a launching pad on the rocky island of Lindisfarne. The island’s missionaries spread throughout pagan Mercia, and Penda’s son became a Christian. Penda tolerated the missionaries; in truth he was less concerned with matters of creed than with getting the upper-hand on Oswald, whose power had reached a zenith; a writer of the Picts called Oswald “Emperor of the Whole of Britain,” a title Penda coveted.

The Shield Wall
Despite Cadwallon’s death under Oswald’s blade in 635, the Welsh continued supporting Penda (Mercia was the lesser of two evils). In 642 Oswald marched into East Anglia to wrench it from Mercian control, but he suffered the same fate as Cadwallon and was slain by Penda’s forces at the Battle of Maserfeld. Penda capitalized on Oswald’s death by seizing Deira, leaving Bernicia alone in Northumbria. Penda marched north from Deira and assaulted the Bernician fortress at Bebbanburg, but he couldn’t get through the fortress’ defenses. Oswald’s Bernician successor, Osuiu, struck out from Bernicia and retook Deira, bringing it back into the Northumbrian fold. The reunification of Northumbria wasn’t something Penda could tolerate, so he marched against Osuiu but died at the Battle of Winwaed. Pagan Penda’s death—and the Mercian defeat—was interpreted as a victory for Christ, and the days of the old Germanic gods in Mercia came to an end. At Penda’s fall Mercia became a vassal state of Northumbria, and it was ruled by Northumbrian thegns reporting directly to Osuiu.

Having extinguished the Mercian threat from without, Osuiu now faced a threat from within, and this one was religious in nature. Northumbria was wholly Christian, but two Christian sects—that of the Irish Church, with its patron saint of Columba, and the Roman Church, with its patron saint of Gregory—threatened to tear Northumbria apart. The matters of contention were trivial, but passions flared. In 664 Osuiu called the Synod of Whitby to determine Northumbria’s religious course. The Roman Church won out, and a number of adherents to Irish Christianity dejectedly retired to Iona. Rome sent a Greek monk named Theodore of Tarsus to Britain with orders to consolidate the English church. He was made Archbishop of Canterbury and focused on the organization of the episcopate; in a lot of ways the Church of England today is the work of Theodore.

Osuiu had simmered the religious passions just in time for another outbreak of hostilities: the Mercian nobles rose up, expelled the Northumbrian thegns from their land, and lifted Penda’s Christian son Wulfhere to the Mercian throne. In 670 the Northumbrian throne passed into new hands, those of Ecgfrith, and Wulfhere sought to take advantage of the new king by marching against Northumbria. Ecgfrith met him on the field and utterly defeated him. Wulfhere bought peace by surrendering Lincolnshire, a region built up around an old Roman town, and Ecgfrith was willing to make peace to focus on westward rather than southward expansion. Wulfhere was left to focus on expanding Mercia southward (by the 670s he had lordship over all the southern Anglo-Saxon kingdoms), and Ecgfrith focused on expanding into North Wales. He ousted the Britons from Cumbria and seized Carlisle, bringing Northumbria to the height of its power. Ecgfrith, perhaps emboldened by his success against the Welsh, attempted an invasion of Mercia, but he was checked by defeat against the new Mercian king, Aethelred, at the Battle of Trent in 679. Checked in the south, Ecgfrith looked to expand northwards. The Picts to the north were a client state of Northumbria, but Ecgfrith was determined to conquer the Picts completely. He marched on them in 685, but this was a bad move: the Picts met his forces and slaughtered them. King Ecgfrith and a host of Northumbrian nobles were killed. At Ecgfrith’s death Northumbria descended into chaos: the rival houses vied for power, and Mercia rose to prominence as her northern enemy devolved into anarchy.

Despite her inexorable decline, southern Northumbria, with its religious sanctuaries, experienced a flourishing of learning and culture and became the center of learning in Britain with schools in York and Jarrow. Baeda—who would come to be known as the Venerable Bede—was the star of Northumbrian scholarship. He taught from the monastery of Jarrow and completed forty-five works by the time of his death, the most notable being his Ecclesiastical History of the English People. He was familiar with Plato and Aristotle, Seneca and Cicero, Lucretius and Ovid and Virgil. He compiled encyclopedias on astronomy and meteorology, physics and music, arithmetic and medicine, philosophy, grammar, and rhetoric. He’s considered the founder of medieval history and the first English historian. Baeda rubbed shoulders with another scholar, Alcuin, who was admired by Frankish and German scholars and beloved by Charlemagne of Frankia. Charlemagne brought Alcuin across the Channel to his court where he spearheaded the so-called Carolingian Renaissance.

Northumbria’s jeweled scholarship didn’t make up for her bloody political feuds, and King Aethelred of Mercia cared little for knowledge and much for land. He marched against Northumbria, but though he was victorious he couldn’t capitalize on his gains. He bought peace and security to the north, thus freeing him to look further south. Wulfhere had stretched Mercia’s southern border, but a new rival—the House of Wessex—was emerging.

the Dragon Banner of Wessex
Wessex was formed by a confederation of Hampshire and Wiltshire Saxons with the Welsh of the Upper Thames. Their confederation may have been prompted by a desire to check the increasing pressure of Mercia on the south. The West Saxons formed their power base around modern-day Winchester and Southampton Water, and by 685 King Caedwalla had annexed the kingdoms of Kent, Surrey, and the South Saxons. King Ine of Wessex (r.688-726) elevated Wessex to the edge of greatness. Ine won a smashing victory against King Ceolred of Mercia in 715, stilting Mercia’s southern ambitions. Ine’s victory showed that Anglo-Saxon England now had three major heavy-hitters: Northumbria to the north, Mercia in the middle, and Wessex in the south. The last century had been marked by contests between Northumbria and Mercia, but now Wessex had joined the fray. Though Ine had brought Wessex to the edge of greatness, he didn’t see it through; he retired to Rome in 726, and in his wake fragile Wessex fell into civil war and anarchy. The new king of Mercia, Aethelbald, took advantage of their weakness and launched an army against them, capturing the royal town of Somerton in 733. For the next 20-odd years all of southern Britain recognized Mercian lordship.

As Mercia rose back to greatness under Aethelbald, and as the West Saxons toiled under Mercian governorship, Northumbria continued passing between different hands. One of the last great Northumbrian kings was Eadbert, who ruled from 737-758. He had a vision of an imperialistic Northumbria, and he tried to bring order from chaos. He was able to repel a Mercian invasion under Aethelbald, and he dealt the Mercians such a blow that not only were their northern ambitions checked but they were also severely weakened to the south. Though his reign was a time of economic prosperity for the kingdom, he failed in his ambitions, and in 758 he gave up on the throne, handing it to his son, and packed his bags for the monastery on Lindisfarne. He would later retire as a monk to York. His son fared no better, and the late historian John Green notes in his England During the Dark Ages, “From the death of Baeda the history of Northumbria became in fact little more than a wild story of lawlessness and bloodshed. King after king was swept away by treason and revolt, the country fell into the hands of its turbulent nobles, and the land was scourged by famine and plague.” This was for the benefit of Mercia, whose attentions had to be focused on the belligerent vassal state of Wessex.

Discontent under Mercian rule and hoping to capitalize on Mercia’s weakened state after its rough-handling by Eadbert of Northumbria, the West Saxons rose up and fought for independence. Though their resistance was sporadic and local at first, it led to a relentless Wessex-wide revolt. In 755 the West Saxon forces marched against Aethelbald. The Mercian king fought valiantly at the Battle of Burford, but at the last moment he was overwhelmed with panic—perhaps his rough treatment by Eadbert weighed heavy on his mind—and he fled the field. The West Saxons won, securing their independence from Mercia. Aethelbald’s defeat at the hands of Eadbert had been embarrassing, but his panicked rout from the West Saxons was nothing short of humiliating; small wonder he lost the trust of the Mercian nobles and was assassinated in 757. Aethelbald was soon succeeded—and avenged—by King Offa, who would be hailed as the greatest king in Mercian history.

a reconstruction of Offa's Dyke
Aethelbald of Mercia had called himself, at least before Wessex’s War of Independence, “King not only of the Mercians but of all the provinces called by the general name Southern English,” and he had influenced affairs in Kent and controlled London on the Thames. Those grand titles would be overshadowed by King Offa, who ruled from AD 757 to 796. Offa would be the most powerful English king until the reign of King Ecgberht of Wessex. Offa brought stability to Mercia and enlarged her borders. In 775 he seized Kent from the Wessex, bringing it under Mercian control, and he squashed a retaliatory West Saxon assault in 779. That same year he marched against Wales and drove the king of Powys (a British kingdom) from his capital. Offa captured the city and changed its name to Shrewsbury, or “The Town in the Scrub.” He didn’t think it worthwhile to push deeper into Wales, so he secured his expansion by building an earthwork military barrier on the Mercia-Welsh border known as Offa’s Dyke. He turned his attention against Wessex once more, seizing Essex, Surrey, and Sussex from their hands. Kent had the nerve to rebel, but Offa squashed the coup and exterminated the Kentish dynasty forever. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle—a collection of annals in Anglo-Saxon Britain that were kept from the late 9th to the mid-12th century—reports in 794 that “In this year Offa, king of Mercia, ordered [Kentish King] Aethelberht’s head to be struck off.” The following year Offa captured East Anglia, restoring Mercia to its widest bounds since the days of Wulfhere. Offa’s power was recognized by King Charlemagne of the Franks, who hailed Offa as an equal—a testimony to the Mercian king’s prestige beyond the British Isles. Offa returned the compliment, emulating Charlemagne in many respects, altering the Mercian government along Frankish lines, shuffling local organization, and reconfiguring the way he exercised royal power.

Under Offa’s guidance, Mercia stretched from the English Channel to the Irish Sea, but it was held together by the sword—and this was an inherent weakness. Mercia’s administrative caliber was less than that of both Northumbria and Wessex, to the point that she even lacked a capital. Northumbria was ruled from York, Wessex from Winchester, but Mercia’s Tamworth was little more than a villa where the Mercian kings preferred to spend their time. Despite Offa’s advances in governorship and administration, the changes wrought weren’t enough to keep his kingdom together absent the threat (and use) of force. Offa’s power came on the coattails of blood, and when his son Egfrith died shortly after Offa himself, the Northumbrian scholar Alcuin noted, “The vengeance for the blood shed by the father has now reached the son; for you know very well how much blood his father shed to secure the kingdom on his son.”

an Anglo-Saxon mead hall
Mercian dominance declined after the death of Egfrith. King Coenwulf was able to keep hold of Kent and Sussex and even gained some territory from the northern Welsh, but he couldn’t wrap his fingers around Wessex. Mercia fell into civil war after Coenwulf’s death, and the political instability couldn’t have come at a worse time: a new dynasty was emerging in Wessex that would usurp Mercia. Across the Channel, the late Offa’s admirer, Charlemagne, was giving sanctuary to a West Saxon named Ecgberht. Ecgberht had claimed the throne of Wessex but had failed in his bid, and he had sought refuge in Charlemagne’s court. He was there until 802, witnessing the emergence of Charlemagne’s “Empire of the West.” Upon returning to Wessex, Ecgberht was quietly embraced as king by the West Saxons. He made good on his kingship by conquering the last tidbits of British Cornwall. In 825 the Mercian king Beornwulf marched into Wiltshire, but Ecgberht defeated him at the Battle of Ellandun. All of England south of the Thames now belonged to Wessex. The East Anglians, under the lordship of Mercia since the days of Offa, took courage from Beornwulf’s defeat and successfully revolted against their Mercian masters. Ecgberht expelled a Mercian under-king from Kent, and then he annexed not only Kent but also Essex, Surrey, and Sussex. Mercia could only watch as her borders shrank, and in 828 Ecgberht went for the jugular: he crossed the Thames and Mercia, cowed into submission, knelt before him and offered her submission. Dreaming of a unified England, Ecgberht marched against Northumbria, which was riven with social strife and reeling from Viking attacks. The Northumbrian thegns met Ecgberht and pledged their allegiance.

The rapid rise and dominance of Wessex has been attributed to two primary factors: Wessex’s wealth skyrocketed after she conquered British Cornwall and took over its mineral resources, and Ecgberht’s wisdom in securing inheritance and royal succession by agreement rather than bloodshed strengthened the Wessex monarchy. Under Ecgberht, England reached a milestone: she was, for the first time ever, unified. But it wouldn’t last. The Northmen—known popularly as the Vikings—would see to that.

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

The Nature of the Anglo-Saxon Invasion

Gildas’ On the Ruin of Britain – Nennius’ History of the Britons – Venerable
Bede & The Ecclesiastical History – The Legend of King Arthur – The
Testimony of Archaeology – Acculturation vs. Conquest

Traditional historians teach that the Anglo-Saxons (not one specific tribe but a coagulation of many) carved a swathe through the tattered remnants of Roman Britain, pressing as far west as Wales and Cornwall, which remained unstained by the Anglo-Saxons and populated by “pure” Romano-British peoples. Medieval historians have various takes on the Anglo-Saxon invasions. The Gallic Chronicle of 452 records for the year 441, “The British provinces, which to this time had suffered various defeats and misfortunes, are reduced to Saxon rule.” Gildas, writing in the early 6th century, interpreted the Saxons as God’s judgment on Britain’s unjust kings and tyrants; according to him, the Anglo-Saxon invasion went as follows: following victory against the Picts and Scots to the north, with the help of the last of the Romans, the British people succumbed to lives of luxury and self-indulgence; but the Picts and Scots threatened again, and without the help of the Romans, the British needed to look elsewhere for help, and they turned to the Saxons, who would fight against the northern enemies in exchange for land in eastern Britain; arriving in Britain, the Saxons started complaining about their treatment by the British, and they turned against the British who had invited them, inaugurating a war that lasted two to three decades. In flowery prose Gildas describes the fateful coming of the Saxon mercenaries:

A multitude of whelps came forth from the lair of this barbaric lioness [the land of the Saxons], in three cyuls, as they call them, that is, in [their] ships of war, with their sails wafted by the wind and with omens and prophecies favourable, for it was foretold by a certain soothsayer among them, that they should occupy the country to which they were sailing three hundred years, and half of that time, a hundred and fifty years, should plunder and despoil the same. They first landed on the eastern side of the island, by the invitation of the unlucky king, and there fixed their sharp talons, apparently to fight in favour of the island, but alas! more truly against it.

The mercenaries soon turned against the Britons who had invited them, and Gildas recounts the destruction they wrought (interpreted as an act of God’s judgment against unjust Briton kings and tyrants):

For the fire of vengeance, justly kindled by former crimes, spread from sea to sea, fed by the hands of our foes in the east, and did not cease, until, destroying the neighboring towns and lands, it reached the other side of the island, and dipped its red and savage tongue in the western ocean… [All] the columns were levelled with the ground by the frequent strokes of the battering-ram, all the husbandmen routed, together with their bishops, priests, and people, whilst the sword gleamed, and the flames crackled around them on every side. Lamentable to behold, in the midst of the streets lay the tops of lofty towers, tumbled to the ground, stones of high walls, holy altars, fragments of human bodies, covered with livid clots of coagulated blood, looking as if they had been squeezed together in a press…

The end of the War of the Saxon Federates (as Gildas called it) came after British victory in the Battle of Mons Badonicus (ca AD 500). Saxon expansion was halted for a while. Gildas was born forty years after the Battle of Mons Badonicus, and during his day the people of Britain lived with the Saxons entrenched in eastern Britain. As to the historicity of Gildas’ account, modern historians speculate that his On the Ruin of Britain was less a record what transpired and more an attempt to make sense of the changes Britain had gone through in the 150 years since the Roman evacuation.

a snapshot of Anglo-Saxon England
Nennius, who wrote in the 7th century, expanded upon Gildas’ account in his History of the Britons, but his history reads more like a romance than anything else. The Venerable Bede, in his Ecclesiastical History of the English People, writes in the 8th century, bringing us up-to-speed in his own day and age. Bede’s history of the Anglo-Saxon Invasion portrays it as happening in three distinct phases: an exploratory phase, when mercenaries were hired to protect the British from inter-island enemies such as the Picts and Scots; an invasion phase, when the Anglo-Saxons warred against the Britons in their grasp for land; and an establishment phase, when the Anglo-Saxons put down roots, built kingdoms, and flourished. It is during Bede’s “Invasion Phase” that the legend of King Arthur takes place: Arthur rallied the Romano-British warriors to his side and stood against the Anglo-Saxons, defeating them time and again, and he was the reported leader of the British in their victory at Mons Badonicus. But the Anglo-Saxons were limitless, and their ships continued sending soldiers to the island’s eastern shores, and it was only a matter of time before Arthur was defeated and laid to rest—with the promise of one day rising again to lead Britain against future foes. It is likely that the Arthurian legend has its basis in some historical figure, though we can know hardly anything (if anything at all) about said figure, since the legends were composed centuries after the supposed events took place. It is during Bede’s “Establishment Phase” that we see the rise of numerous Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, the most notable of which are Northumbria, Mercia, East Anglia, and Wessex.


a reconstructed Anglo-Saxon homestead
Medieval historians are adamant that the Anglo-Saxon invasion took place at the point of the sword and happened through violent conquest; however, these historians often wrote long after the events, and new archaeological studies imply that these historians relied more on legend than fact. This isn’t surprising, since medieval historians didn’t mind mixing history and fantasy. Archaeologists are coming to agree that the Anglo-Saxon conquest didn’t happen by force but by acculturation, which is the “transference of ideas, beliefs, and traditions by long-term personal contact and interaction between communities or societies.” Acculturation speaks to “adoption through assimilation by prolonged contact.” In the same way that the Beaker Invasion of prehistoric times was likely an invasion of culture and ideas rather than foreigners, so the Anglo-Saxon Invasion may be due more to the spread of Germanic culture and ideas than conquest by force. Foreign objects at archaeological sites don’t necessitate foreigners carrying them anymore than a Mercedes-Benz must be driven by a German. Britain was a huge trading hub even after the departure of the Romans, and though it is certain that Angles, Saxons, and Jutes settled in eastern Britain, it is likely that their dominance came more by the spread of their culture than by overturning population centers. This would help explain why western Britain retained a Celtic Christian culture: western Britain traded primarily with Ireland while eastern Britain focused on cross-channel trade with modern-day France and Germany (the homeland of the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes). In her book Britain After Rome, Robin Fleming notes, “It is now recognized that the Anglo-Saxon invasions were a long, gradual settlement lasting about 200 years, that the invaders were much more mixed in the same areas than Bede supposed, that the kingdoms were ‘made in England’ and that the native population survived, especially in the West, in a stronger and more coherent state than was previously supposed.” 

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Anglo-Saxon England: A Survey



Roman Britain reached its official end in AD 409, when the last of the legions departed the British isles to fight on the continent. Not all the soldiers left; some remained behind, privatizing their services to the highest bidder, and others cut their losses and settled in the towns and countryside. Britain remained a Roman province in name only, and with the departure of the Romans new invaders set their sights on the island: the Germanic tribes of the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. In truth these continental peoples had been raiding Britain for some time, but now they began to settle and pushed inwards from the east. Eastern Britain succumbed to the Anglo-Saxons (though this was likely more a matter of acculturation than conquest), and by the turn of the 6th century the original British culture was largely confined to the western fringes of the island, in Wales and Cornwall. A Christian Celtic culture flourished around the Irish Sea, and an Anglo-Saxon culture had embedded itself in eastern Britain.

Having conquered the British Isles—either by acculturation or conquest—the Anglo-Saxons transformed the landscape of eastern Britain. The first half of Anglo-Saxon Britain is marked by the rise and fall of various kingdoms. The original Britons, who still clung to their culture, were slowly pressed to the western fringes of the island. The main English kingdoms, which played pivotal roles in the history of this time period, were the kingdoms of Northumbria, Mercia, East Anglia, and Wessex. These kingdoms were at variance and warred with one another, and a number of kings conquered wide tracts of territory, becoming semi-overlords of southern Britain, and received the title Bretwalda (meaning “King of Britain”). Amid the constant feuds and bloodletting, Christianity spread like wildfire. Christianity had been introduced to the island by the Romans, and around AD 650 it blossomed. After this point the religious changes in Britain wouldn’t be matched until the Reformation Period a thousand years later. As an example, midway through the 7th century there were little more than a dozen monasteries on the island, but by the advent of the Viking Age there were at least two hundred.  The changes wrought by the establishment of the Anglo-Saxons weren’t limited to religion or politics; as the late historian John Green notes:

[The Anglo-Saxon Age] was, in fact, an age of revolution—an age in which mighty changes were passing over every phase of the life of the English-men; an age in which heathendom was passing into Christianity, the tribal king into the national ruler, the aetheling into the thegn; an age in which English society saw the beginnings of the change which transformed the noble into a lord, and the free ceorl into a dependent or a serf; an age in which new moral conceptions told on the fabric of our early jurisprudence, and in which custom began to harden into written law.
     (from The Conquest of England, 1883)

The relentless feuds weakened the squabbling kingdoms, and a third invader since the days of the Romans took advantage of their weakness. The Northmen (mainly the Danes, but also including Norwegians and Swedes) began raiding the British isles before invading to seize land for farming and settlement. When raiding they were known as Vikings, but they were principally known as the Northmen (“Viking” is a verb rather than a noun, meaning “raiding,” so saying “Viking Raiders” is a lot like saying “Policing Policemen”). In time the Danes swallowed Northumbria, Mercia, and East Anglia and created from their residue “The Danelaw,” land controlled by various Danish warlords. The Danes marched against Wessex, but a famous Wessex king, Alfred the Great (the only English monarch to be known as “The Great”) successfully opposed them. He halted the spread of the Northmen and kept England (embodied in Wessex) alive. His later successors weren’t as successful, however, and for a brief period of time the Danes, under King Cnut (a.k.a. Canute), ruled all of the British isles except for the western contingents of the Britons. Power eventually transferred back to English rulers, but this was short-lived: for a time England had been populated by Norman settlers and nobles, and these were the first stages of the fourth (and last) major invasion of the British Isles: that of the Normans.

Friday, March 31, 2017

prehistory: a timeline





THE PLEISTOCENE EPOCH


The Middle Paleolithic

200,000 BP (Before Present) - first appearance of Homo sapiens in Africa

170,000 BP - humans begin wearing clothing

120,000-90,000 BP - the Sahara Desert is wet and fertile

82,000 BP - first appearance of jewelry

70,000 BP - first example of abstract art in South Africa

64,000 BP - the bow and arrow replaces throwing spears in Africa


The Upper Paleolithic

50,000-30,000 BP - Late Stone Age begins in Africa

45,000-43,000 BP - Cro-Magnon colonization of Europe

42,000 BP - earliest evidence of advanced deep sea fishing technology in the Pacific

40,000 BP - extinction of Homo neanderthalensis

40,000 BP - earliest example of figurative art in Germany

40,000 BP - earliest known cave paintings in Spain

40,000-30,000 BP - first human settlements

40,000-20,000 BP - earliest known ritual cremation

33,000 BP - earliest known domesticated dog skulls in Europe and Siberia

28,500 BP - New Guinea is populated by colonists from Asia or Australia

28,000 BP - oldest known twisted rope

28,000 - 24,000 BP - oldest known pottery

28,000 - 20,000 BP - harpoons and saws invented in Europe

26,000 BP - people begin using fibers to make baby carriers, clothes, bags, baskets, and nets

26,000-20,000 BP - the height of the last Ice Age

25,000 - oldest known permanent human settlement in Czech Republic


The Mesolithic 

20,000 BP - oldest pottery for cooking found in China

16,500-13,000 BP - first colonization of North America

15,000 BP - the woolly rhinoceros goes extinct

15,000-14,700 BP - earliest supposed dates for the domestication of pigs

13,000-10,000 BP - Ice Age comes to an end, and the climate warms as glaciers recede

13,000-11,000 BP - earliest supposed dates for the domestication of sheep

12,000 BP - earliest evidence for Jericho as a settlement

12,000 BP - earliest supposed date for the domestication of the goat



THE HOLOCENE EPOCH
   *dates now in BC


The Mesolithic, continued

10,000 BC - land ice leaves Denmark and southern Sweden

9,000 BC - earliest date for the oldest surviving proto-religious site, in Turkey

9,000 BC - giant short-faced bears and giant ground sloths go extinct

8,500 BC - earliest supposed date for the domestication of cattle

8,000 BC - the end of the Quaternary Extinction Event, which has been underway since the mid-Pleistocene. Casualties of the Quaternary extinction include many of the Ice Age megafauna (e.g. megatherium, Irish elk, and sabre-toothed cats). Mammoths dies out in Eurasia and North America but continue in isolation on islands until around 1650 BC.


The Neolithic

9500-5900 BC - the Sahara Desert becomes a savanna

9500 BC - earliest supposed date for the domestication of the cat

8000-7000 BC - the cultivation of wheat and barley begins in modern-day northern Iraq

6200 BC - first copper smelting appears in Anatolia

6000 BC - East Africa and Mesopotamia begin to dry out

5500 BC - evidence of copper smelting in modern Serbia

5200-4000 BC - first farming settlements show up on Malta

5000 BC - the wheel is invented

5000 BC - the invention of proto-writing

4000 BC - earliest supposed dates for the domestication of horses and chickens

3900 BC - the Sahara dries out, and Africans migrate towards the Nile to survive

3800 BC - earliest evidence for bronze working (mixing copper and tin)

3700 BC - Minoan civilization emerges in Crete

3500 BC - first evidence of mummification in Egypt

3500 BC - farming has spread across Europe


The Bronze Age

3500 BC - bronze tools and weapons are made in the Near and Middle East

3500 BC - bronze craftsmanship spreads through the Mediterranean

3400 BC - priests become the rulers of Mesopotamian cities

3000 BC - first evidence of habitation at Thebes, Egypt

3000 BC - first bronze age settlements in Jerusalem

2800-1900 BC - the Bell Beaker culture sweeps through Europe

2500 BC - the Indus Valley civilization employs bronze craftsmanship

2400 BC - bronze begins to be used in China

2300 BC - the Bronze Age begins in Europe

2100 BC - first ziggurats in Ur, Eridu, Uruk, and Nippur

2000 BC - bronze craftsmanship spreads to the British Isles

2000 BC - the pottery wheel is introduced to Minoan civilization on Crete

2000 BC - early Greeks settle on the Pelopponesian peninsula

1795-1750 BC - the reign of Hammurabi, king of Babylon

1772 BC - the Code of Hammurabi is written, one of the world's earliest law codes

1650 BC - volcanic eruption of Thera in the Mediterranean

1640 BC - the Egyptians embrace bronze tools and weapons in the wake of the Hyksos

1595 BC - the Hittites sack Babylon

1500 BC - Egyptian empire reaches its greatest extent under Thutmose I

1500 BC - pastoral farming spreads across the Eurasian steppes

1380 BC - first evidence of iron-working 

1100 BC - hill forts emerge in western Europe


The Iron Age

1100-600 BC - public buildings erected at the Agora in Athens

750 BC - iron-working is introduced to Egypt

700 BC - iron is in wide use throughout Europe


Thursday, March 30, 2017

prehistoric britain



Prehistoric Britain stretches from 42,000 BP (before present) to AD 43, when Roman armies under Emperor Claudius invaded to turn the island into a Roman province. That the end of “prehistoric” Britain has arrived so recently may seem odd, but it’s because prior to the Romans, Britons didn’t leave behind any written histories (or written languages at all).


Britain in the Stone Age

Early Britons on the hunt
Human beings first reached Britain around 42,000 years before the present, and they roamed the island as hunters and gatherers until about 25,000 years ago, when they were forced to leave Britain because of the last Ice Age. Ice sheets drenched northern Britain, turning the climate into a cold-blasted and uninhabitable tundra. The sea levels dropped so much that an ancient land bridge, known as Doggerland, stretched across the modern North Sea to connect Britain to the continent. The last Ice Age ended around 15,000 years ago, and people began crossing Doggerland to retake Britain. Major food sources included wild horses, red deer, and hares, along with rhinos, hyena, and the last vestiges of the mammoths. Another brief cold spell drained Britain of most of its inhabitants, but the climate began to warm around 11,600 years ago (marking the end of the Pleistocene and the beginning of the Holocene).

The population of Britain began to steadily rise. As the sea levels rose, Doggerland turned into a string of islands before being completely submerged around 5600 BC. Britain thus became an island again, and has remained an island ever since. As the climate continued, the open spaces of the arctic environment were replaced with forests of pine, birch, and alder. The open spaces had given room for large herds of reindeer and wild horse, but as woodlands spread across the island, the peoples’ diets consisted primarily of boar (wild pig) and less social animals (who didn’t need large tracts of roaming land) such as elk, red deer, roe deer, and aurochs (wild cattle). Around this time the dog was domesticated to help in the woodland hunts.
Britain in the Stone Age

The inhabitants of this time were highly mobile, roaming over wide tracts of land and carrying toolkits. Stone Age sites of this period reveal tools made of flint, bone, and antler; and jewelry made of amber, animal teeth, and mammoth ivory. There’s ample evidence that the tribes of eastern Britain traded with the tribes across the Channel, and people began to move into modern-day Scotland. Archaeology implies that nomadic hunter-gatherers, forced by the changing environment to adapt their lifestyles, began building semi-permanent settlements between which they alternated during the seasons.

By 4000 BC these semi-nomadic hunter-gatherers were embracing farming; though older historians interpreted this as an invasion of Neolithic farmers from the continent, archaeology tells us that Britain’s “Neolithic Revolution” came about not due to an invasion of foreigners but to a gradual embracing of Neolithic ideas. As farming and husbandry were further embraced, woodland was cut down and grassland increased.

Around this time (ca 4400 BC), British peoples began building their infamous earthworks: they started with long barrows and causewayed enclosures; around 3300-2900 BC they embraced cursus monuments, chamber tombs, and stone circles; and around 2900-2200 BC, new enclosures called “henges” were built, including the infamous Stonehenge, Avebury, and Silbury Hill. About this time industrial flint making took off, and trade between Britain and continent increased.


Britain in the Bronze Age

The beginning of the Bronze Age in Europe facilitated a need for tin (which was mixed with copper to make bronze), and because southern Britain had lots of tin, that part of the island experienced a trade boom around 1600 BC. The Bronze Age in Britain is known for the “Beaker Invasion,” referring to a type of culture characterized by “beakers” (a type of pottery) among other things. Though old historians believed the Beaker Invasion was an invasion of foreigners who swept through Britain, archaeology implies that this, like the emergence of farming and husbandry, was an invasion of ideas. The Beaker Phenomenon was a cultural fad that swept the continent and reached into Britain, and it was embraced by elites who wished to make their status known.


Britain in the Iron Age

The Bronze Age in Britain came to an end around 750 BC when iron working techniques arrived from southern Europe. Iron was stronger and more plentiful than bronze, so it was widely embraced. The advent of iron revolutionized not just warfare but agriculture: iron tipped ploughs could churn up soil quicker and deeper than wooden or bronze ones, and iron axes could clear woodlands far more efficiently. It’s speculated that around 500 BC most Britons were speaking what’s known as “Common Brythonic.”

Iron Age Britons lived in organized tribal groups ruled by a chieftain. As people became more numerous (due to increasing birth rates, migration from the continent, and the ability to feed more people because of farming), wars broke out between opposing tribes. Hill forts were built throughout the land; nearly 2000 have been discovered, but most hill forts fell out of use around 350 BC while the remaining ones were strengthened. By this time the Britons were known as excellent wheat farmers, and their trade with the continent was dominated by hunting dogs, animal skins, and slaves (from the numerous wars between themselves). Prior to the Punic Wars (264 to 146 BC), the Carthaginian Empire dominated Mediterranean trade; in the wake of the Punic Wars, Rome took over this trade, and she carried her goods into the Atlantic. Trade with Rome brought about changes in British life and society: around 100 BC iron bars began to be used as currency, coinage was developed, and consumers warmed up to Roman products. This has been called the “first” Roman invasion.As the Roman Empire pressed west from Italy, Germanic refugees from Gaul (modern-day France and Belgium) fled to safety across the Channel. These Gauls were known as the Belgae, and their migrations to Britain reached their zenith around 50 BC as Caesar was subduing the future Roman province. The Belgae settled along the eastern coast of Britain between 200 BC and AD 43; a Gallic tribe known as the Parisi, who had cultural links to the area around Paris, settled in northern England. By AD 43, the major tribal power-players of Britain included the Durotriges, the Atrebates, the Dumnonii, the Ordovices, the Silures, the Iceni, the Catuvellauni, and the Trinovantes. The Romans would use these tribes, often at variance with one another, to their own advantage—Roman Britain would be won not merely by force but largely by diplomacy. 

The Children's Westminster Catechism: Question 4

Question: How can you glorify God? Answer: By loving him and doing what he commands. We saw in Question 3 of the Children's Catechism th...