1
PETER 1.14-16
As obedient children, do not be
conformed to the passions of your former ignorance, but as he who called you is
holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, since it is written, “You shall be
holy, for I am holy.”
A focused hope leads to a focused life. The result
is that hope-filled living looks markedly different from the pattern of living
so common in the present evil age. Although history has been marked by
different epochs and ages since the inauguration of God’s kingdom, God’s
kingdom has not yet been fully consummated, and many people live out-of-tune
with God’s in-breaking kingdom, conforming their lives to the present evil age.
Christians are to be the salt of the earth and lights in the darkness, pointing
forward to a different way of being human, a way marked by genuine human living
and by embracing in the present the future reality of the cosmos.
Henry
David Thoreau, in his book Walden,
writes that “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.” What Thoreau
noticed is what countless psychologists and sociologists haven’t missed: there’s
something amiss in human living. This is, as we’ve seen, nothing new; the
ancient philosophers sought to resolve this problem, sought to pave the way to
genuine human living (over against living lives of quiet desperation). The
philosophers sought eudaimonia, the
fully-flourishing human life; and Christians teach that eudaimonia is found only in Christ, only in what God is doing and
will do in the world. Though eudaimonia
cannot be wholly experienced in the present (due to the tension between Easter
and Consummation) Christians are to live as is fitting for renewed human
beings. This manner of living consists of bringing the future, God’s
fully-realized kingdom, into the present, and this involves conforming our
thinking and behaviors around that. By this point, this statement should be
nothing new. But perhaps now we can observe the contrast between what a hope-filled, focused life looks like
over against the caricature of a desperate
life (as Thoreau identified the mass of men living).
While
a focused life is diligent and self-controlled, an unfocused life is loose and
wandering. One whose life is focused can prioritize one’s habits and activities
accordingly; when there is no focus, the result is a chaotic cesspool of
frantic, desperate living. The focused life is a life with clear goals (that
is, our future inheritance) and the manner of working towards those goals is
clear (ethical living); an unfocused life is subject to countless shifting and
changing goals, resulting in a life characterized by anxiety, restlessness, and
worry. The focused life is a life centered upon a sure hope; an unfocused life
clutches at every hope that seems to pass by.
The
contrast goes deeper than mere externalities. Someone can be focused on
something that is undeserving of focus; one can have clear goals, clear steps
towards those goals, and yet be missing the mark entirely. At the heart of it
all is the human heart. Conforming to the pattern of this world involves making
oneself a slave to oneself; it’s making oneself King and, even worse, making
oneself out to be God. Selfishness, greed, self-indulgence, indifference to men
and to God: that is what a heart looks like in conformation to the present evil
age. This fleshes itself out in pursuing the “passions”: the selfish desires of
the heart. The gods of Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud are worshipped all over the
globe: money, power, and sex are the focus of the world’s attention. The marked
difference between God’s people and those enslaved to the present evil age goes
deeper than mere “habits of desperation”; it cuts straight to the heart. God’s
people are to shine as lights in the darkness, to be salt of the earth, and not
just by the things that they do or don’t do (though that’s involved, of course)
but, primarily, by the kind of people
they are.
In
a world dominated by selfishness, God’s people are to be selfless.
In
a world dominated by greed, God’s people are to be self-giving.
In
a world dominated by self-indulgence, God’s people are to be self-controlled.
In
a world dominated by indifference, God’s people are to be filled with love.
In
a world dominated by the lust for power, God’s people are to be humble.
In
a world dominated by the lust for money, God’s people are to be generous.
In
a world dominated by lust, God’s people are to treat sex as a sacrament rather
than as a toy.
“Do
not be conformed to the passions of your former ignorance,” St. Peter says. In
other words: “You didn’t know any better back then. But now you do. So live
like it!” Many of the Christians in Asia Minor, if not most of them, came from
pagan backgrounds. The pagan worldview wildly differed from the Christian
worldview; and the pagan perspective of the future—a perspective Nietzsche’s
nihilism would embrace, where after death comes nothingness—stood as black
against white to the Christian perspective of the future. Having converted to
Christianity, having put their faith in Messiah, having repented of their
former devotions, having been baptized into God’s household, the Christians in
Asia Minor were to live according to a different “code of ethics,” a different
manner of living. And this manner of living can be summed up in one word: holiness.
*
* *
If
you’re anything like me, the word “holiness” makes you squirm. It invokes
images of deadness: a withered, naked tree with drooping and gnarled limbs and
peeling bark. This poetic caricature is due to stereotypes that have been
reinforced by countless well-meaning (but ill-sighted) Christians over the
decades. Holiness doesn’t mean no smoking, no drinking, and no dancing (as some
would have you believe). Nor does it mean profaning the very word “fun” and
spending all day pouring over the Bible and reciting ancient prayers. The word
itself literally means “to be separate,” and St. Peter quotes an Old Testament
text—Leviticus 11.44—to echo an important narrative. In Leviticus 11.44, God
calls Israel to be holy and to live differently from her pagan neighbors. It
was Torah’s aim to keep Israel distinct and separate from the pagan nations.
Now, with the coming of Messiah and his enthronement over the world, Israel has
been reworked around Jesus, so that the church is Israel, the people of God.
But God’s command to his people hasn’t changed; it’s the same as it was since
the beginning: “Be Holy.”
The
church is to be holy—distinct and separate—from her pagan neighbors, not in the
sense of adhering to the Mosaic Law but living as is fitting for genuine human
beings. Holiness—being “set apart”—is all about living as genuine human beings
in a world that is filled with dehumanized human beings in need of rescue and
renewal. Indeed, St. Peter’s identification of the Christians in this
verse—“obedient children”—is both preceded and followed by mention of regeneration
(1.3, 1.23). Christians are precisely God’s children because they have been
born again, regenerated as genuine human beings, freed from the dehumanizing
affects of sin on their human nature. Here’s the rub: Those who live in ignorance, outside of God’s covenant family, live
dehumanized lives; those who are in God’s covenant family, those who are God’s
children, have been born again and are to live accordingly, living-out their
new identities as God’s renewed humanity; and this involves being separate
(read: holy). On the metaphysical level, the level of our truest
identities, we ARE holy, both individually and corporately, and we need to LIVE
LIKE IT.
*
* *
“If
holiness means separateness,” you might ask, “then how is God holy? How is he
separate?” When we speak of God being holy, we often speak of it as if it is
one of his character traits. Indeed, in a sense, it is. But the term itself
doesn’t denote any specific aspect of his character—either goodness,
gentleness, love, or even wrath—but, rather, speaks to an over-arching reality
regarding God:
He is separate and distinct, set apart. The question remains: how
is he set apart? We can take the anthropological route: “He’s God, and we
are not.” If that doesn’t satisfy, try the philosopher’s answer: “God’s
separate from evil.” While these two answers remain the most popular, in the
sense of being the most widely-held, I think a more adequate answer takes into
account the historical context of Leviticus 11.44: “God is holy in the sense
that he is separate and distinct from the
pagan gods.”
After
defeating a myriad of Egyptian gods in the Exodus narrative (each plague, and
even the Red Sea crossing, attacked and defeated various Egyptian deities), and
prior to delivering his people into the Promised Land where even more malicious
gods dwelt (characters such as Dagon,
Molech, and Ba’al were waiting to be tangled with), God identified himself as
holy and set apart from these pagan gods, markedly distinct from the uncaring,
capricious, and temperamental gods who characterized pagan theology. The God of
the Exodus is loving, benevolent, patient, and just; and thus he’s wildly
different than the gods whom he defeated in Egypt and whom he’d defeat in the
Promised Land. And just as God was distinct from the pagan gods, so his people
needed to be likewise distinct from the these gods’ pagan worshippers.
While
it’s rare nowadays to find people worshipping these ancient gods (though it’s
become popular, in some New Age movements, to resurrect such pagan worship),
the call to holiness hasn’t been tossed aside. Those who haven’t responded to
the gospel and turned to Messiah are conformed to the patterns of this present
age, living “in tune” with a world marked by sin and death, decay and
corruption. These modes of living court the present evil age with all its
trademarks, and fallen humanity lives like animals rather than as human beings.
Christians, renewed after the image of their creator, conforming to Christ, having been made and becoming genuinely
human, are to live genuinely human lives, and such living will be (by its
very nature) distinct from the patterns of living resplendent with those who
haven’t experienced the rescue and renewal found in Christ. The benchmarks of
Christian ethics (faith, hope, and love in 1 Corinthians 13 and the “fruit of
the Spirit” in Galatians 5) are signposts to what genuine human living looks
like. Just read any newspaper and see how much human beings have fallen from
genuine human living, and may we as God’s people, as God’s rescued and renewed
humanity, strive to live as is appropriate for his image-bearing creatures.
No comments:
Post a Comment